Gupta v. Cate et al

Filing 83

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/11/2014 ORDERING that in light of the notice of imminent dismissal of this case, all pending motions and deadlines are VACATED; pursuant to L.R. 160(b), the parties have 21 days to file the stipulation dismissing this case. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAJ CHRISTOPHER GUPTA, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-1693 WBS AC P v. MATTHEW CATE, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se who filed an action pursuant to 42 U.S. ยง 18 1983. A Discovery and Scheduling Order in this matter was filed on July 24, 2013. ECF No. 21. 19 Several requests or motions are pending. See ECF Nos. 39, 40, 54, 63, 79. 20 On April 4, 2014, defendants notified the court pursuant to Local Rule 160(a) that the 21 parties have reached a settlement in this matter, are in the process of preparing a Settlement 22 Agreement and Release, and will upon execution of the agreement file a stipulated dismissal of 23 this case with prejudice. Defendants request that all pending deadlines in this case be vacated. 24 Pursuant to L.R. 160(b), the parties have twenty-one days to file the stipulation dismissing 25 this case. 26 //// 27 //// 28 1 1 2 3 4 In light of the notice of the imminent dismissal of this case, all pending motions and deadlines in this case are hereby VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 11, 2014 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?