Gupta v. Cate et al

Filing 87

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 5/14/14 ORDERING that defendants request for a 30-day extension of time in which to file the Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice is hereby GRANTED. The Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice shall be filed on or before June 16, 2014.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4

Natalie P. Vance, Bar No. 206708
Gregory T. Fayard, Bar No. 212930
KLINEDINST PC
801 K Street, Suite 2100
Sacramento, California 95814
[phone]/FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Rachel Love, AZ Bar No. 019881
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Jacob B. Lee, AZ Bar No. 030371
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
STRUCK WIENEKE & LOVE, P.L.C.
3100 West Ray Road, Suite 300
Chandler, Arizona 85226
[phone]/FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Matthew Cate, Scott
Kernan, Terri McDonald, George Giurbino, Fred
Figueroa, A. Perez, Dalinda Harman, D. Huser,
M. Williams, K. Pool and J.D. Lozano

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

Raj Christopher Gupta,

17

Plaintiff,

18

v.

19

Matthew Cate, Scott Kernan, Terri
McDonald, George Giurbino, Fred
Figueroa, Roger Blackshear, B. Barton, A.
Perez, Dalinda Harman, D. Huser, B. Walls,
S. Roacho, C. Vaca, M. Williams, E.
Brooks, K. Pool, J.D. Lozano,

20
21
22
23

Case No. 2:12-cv-1693 AC P

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE STIPULATION TO DISMISS
WITH PREJUDICE

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28

Upon consideration of Defendants’ Second Motion for Extension of Time to File
Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice, and for good cause shown therein,

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ request for a 30-day extension of

2

time in which to file the Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice is hereby GRANTED. The

3

Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice shall be filed on or before June 16, 2014.

4
5

DATED: May 14, 2014

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-