Gupta v. Cate et al

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 6/9/14: Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice is hereby GRANTED. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4

Natalie P. Vance, Bar No. 206708
Gregory T. Fayard, Bar No. 212930
KLINEDINST PC
801 K Street, Suite 2100
Sacramento, California 95814
[phone]/FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Rachel Love, AZ Bar No. 019881
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Jacob B. Lee, AZ Bar No. 030371
(Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
STRUCK WIENEKE & LOVE, P.L.C.
3100 West Ray Road, Suite 300
Chandler, Arizona 85226
[phone]/FAX [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants Matthew Cate, Scott
Kernan, Terri McDonald, George Giurbino, Fred
Figueroa, A. Perez, Dalinda Harman, D. Huser,
M. Williams, K. Pool and J.D. Lozano

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16

Raj Christopher Gupta,

17

Case No. 2:12-cv-1693 WBS AC

Plaintiff,

18

v.

19

Matthew Cate, Scott Kernan, Terri
McDonald, George Giurbino, Fred
Figueroa, Roger Blackshear, B. Barton, A.
Perez, Dalinda Harman, D. Huser, B. Walls,
S. Roacho, C. Vaca, M. Williams, E.
Brooks, K. Pool, J.D. Lozano,

20
21
22
23

ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE

Defendants.

24
25
26

Upon consideration of the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice (Doc. 88),
and for good cause shown therein,

27
28
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
2:12-cv-1693 WBS AC

1
2

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice
is hereby GRANTED.

3
4

Dated: June 9, 2014

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

2:12-cv-1693 WBS AC