Schmuckley et al v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 193

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/11/2019 MODIFYING the Last Day to Depose Defendant's Sampling Methodology and Statistical Expert to 4/10/2019; Defendant's Motion Challenging Plaintiffs' Samplin g Methodology and Design to 4/15/2019; Plaintiffs' Opposition Brief to 5/15/2019; Defendant's Reply Brief to 6/5/2019. The court also resets the 6/14/2019 Hearing on Motion date to 6/28/2019, at 10:00 A.M., due to adjustments in Judge Mueller's calendar schedule. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ERIC W. SITARCHUK, Admitted pro hac vice eric.sitarchuk@morganlewis.com KELLY A. MOORE, Admitted pro hac vice kelly.moore@morganlewis.com BENJAMIN P. SMITH, Bar No. 197551 benjamin.smith@morganlewis.com MICHAEL Q. EAGAN, JR., Bar No. 275823 michael.eagan@morganlewis.com One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1596 Tel: +1.415.442.1000; Fax: +1.415.442.1001 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant RITE AID CORPORATION 9 [Additional counsel on signature page] 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR., Plaintiffs, 16 vs. 17 18 JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PHASE 1 BRIEFING DEADLINES [ECF NO. 176] Complaint Filed: September 21, 2017 RITE AID CORPORATION, Defendant. 19 20 Case No. 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-EFB STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR., 21 Plaintiffs, 22 vs. 23 RITE AID CORPORATION, 24 Defendant. 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO DB1/ 102178139.7 JT. STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PHASE 1 BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 2:12-CV-01699-KJM-EFB 1 RECITALS 2 WHEREAS, on December 12, 2018, the Court issued an order [ECF No. 176] (“Order”) 3 modifying certain deadlines for Phase 1 and Phase 2 discovery in this matter, including the 4 deadlines for briefing regarding Defendant Rite Aid Corporation’s (“Defendant”) Motion 5 Challenging Plaintiffs’ Sampling Methodology and Design (“Motion”); 6 WHEREAS, Defendant continues to seek documents and testimony it contends are 7 relevant to its Motion, including from the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District 8 of California (“USAO”) and California’s Department of Health Care Services (“DHCS”); 9 10 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Order, on February 15, 2019, Defendant served Report No. 1 of Dr. Roy J. Epstein, PhD, Defendant’s sampling expert; 11 12 WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court’s prior Order, Dr. Epstein’s deposition was ordered to take place prior to March 29, 2019; 13 WHEREAS, Dr. Epstein is now unavailable for deposition during the month of March 14 2019 because he is currently running to be elected as a selectman in his home town of Belmont, 15 Massachusetts, with the election being set for April 2, 2019; 16 WHEREAS, in light of the above, plaintiff-in-intervention the State of California (“State” 17 or “California”), qui tam plaintiff Loyd F. Schmuckley, Jr. (“Relator,” together with the State, 18 “Plaintiffs”), and Defendant (together with the Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) have met and conferred, 19 and intend to proceed with Dr. Epstein’s deposition on April 10, 2019 in Boston, Massachusetts; 20 and 21 WHEREAS, the Parties hereby agree that a two-week extension of the briefing deadlines 22 for Defendant’s Motion set forth in the Order is warranted to alleviate the scheduling issues 23 discussed above; 24 The Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 1 DB1/ 102178139.7 JT. STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PHASE 1 BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 2:12-CV-01699-KJM-EFB 1 STIPULATION 2 3 The Parties stipulate and request that the Court order the following modifications to its December 12, 2018 Order: 4 Event Current Date [ECF No. 176] Proposed Modified Date Defendant’s Disclosure of Sampling Methodology Expert Report and Materials 2/15/2019 2/15/2019 Last Day to Depose Defendant’s Sampling Methodology and Statistical Expert 3/29/2019 4/10/2019 Defendant’s Motion Challenging Plaintiffs’ Sampling Methodology and Design 4/1/2019 4/15/2019 Plaintiffs’ Opposition Brief 5/1/2019 5/15/2019 14 Defendant’s Reply Brief 5/22/2019 6/5/2019 15 Hearing on Motion 6/14/2019 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom No. 3 6/14/2019 at 10:00 A.M. in Courtroom No. 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 [Unchanged] 16 [Unchanged1] 17 First Phase of Discovery Completed 18 6/26/2019 6/26/2019 [Unchanged] 19 20 Respectfully Submitted, 21 22 Dated: March 6, 2019 23 XAVIER BECERRA California Attorney General /s/ Emmanuel R. Salazar as authorized on 3/6/2019 EMMANUEL R. SALAZAR Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for the State of California 24 25 26 1 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO The Parties do not propose modification of the hearing date at this time. However, if the Court feels it may need more time to review and analyze the Parties’ respective briefing following the filing of Defendant’s reply, the Parties are amenable to the Court’s moving this hearing to a more convenient date. 2 2 DB1/ 102178139.7 JT. STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PHASE 1 BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 2:12-CV-01699-KJM-EFB 1 2 Dated: March 6, 2019 /s/ Wm. Paul Lawrence II as authorized on 3/6/2019 WM. PAUL LAWRENCE II Attorneys for Loyd F. Schmuckley, Jr. 3 4 5 WATERS & KRAUS LLP Dated: March 6, 2019 6 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP /s/ Michael Q. Eagan, Jr. BENJAMIN P. SMITH MICHAEL Q. EAGAN, JR. Attorneys for Rite Aid Corporation 7 8 9 10 ORDER 11 The above having been stipulated by the Parties, and the Court finding good cause 12 therefor, IT IS SO ORDERED that the dates outlined in the Court’s December 12, 2018 Order 13 14 [ECF No. 176] are hereby modified as proposed and set forth in the Stipulation above. The court 15 also resets the June 14, 2019 Hearing on Motion date to June 28, 2019, at 10:00 A.M., due to 16 adjustments in Judge Mueller’s calendar schedule. 17 DATED: March 11, 2019. 18 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SAN FRANCISCO 3 3 DB1/ 102178139.7 JT. STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING PHASE 1 BRIEFING DEADLINES Case No. 2:12-CV-01699-KJM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?