Schmuckley et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
390
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/4/2021 GRANTING 379 Motion to Compel. Rite Aid shall serve further responses to California's Interrogatory No. 1 by no later than 3/5/2021; and Rite Aid shall serve further responses to Californias Interrogatories Nos. 2-5 by no later than 4/26/2021. (Tupolo, A)
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-EFB Document 390 Filed 02/04/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel.
LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR.,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
No. 2:12-cv-1699-KJM-EFB
ORDER AFTER HEARING
v.
15
RITE AID CORPORATION,
16
Defendant.
17
18
This case was before the court on February 3, 2021, for hearing on plaintiff-intervenor
19
State of California’s motion to compel defendant Rite Aid Corporation to provide further
20
responses to interrogatories. ECF No. 379. California Deputy Attorneys General Kevin Davis,
21
Emmanuel Salazar, Bernice Yew, and Vincent DiCarlo appeared on behalf of California.
22
Attorneys Jennifer Bartlett and Paul Lawrence appeared on behalf of relator, and attorney Kevin
23
Papay appeared on behalf of Rite Aid.
24
For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that:
25
1. California’s motion to compel Rite Aid to provide further responses to interrogatories
26
27
28
(ECF No. 379) is granted;
2. Rite Aid shall serve further responses to California’s Interrogatory No. 1 by no later
than March 5, 2021; and
1
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-EFB Document 390 Filed 02/04/21 Page 2 of 2
1
3. Rite Aid shall serve further responses to California’s Interrogatories Nos. 2-5 by no
2
later than April 26, 2021.
3
DATED: February 4, 2021.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?