Schmuckley et al v. Rite Aid Corporation

Filing 414

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/21 APPROVING 411 Stipulation re Admissibility of Pharmacy Records. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ROB BONTA Attorney General of California VINCENT DICARLO Supervising Deputy Attorney General BERNICE L. LOUIE YEW, State Bar No. 114601 Deputy Attorney General Email: Bernice.Yew@doj.ca.gov EMMANUEL R. SALAZAR, State Bar No. 240794 Deputy Attorney General E-mail: Emmanuel.Salazar@doj.ca.gov KEVIN C. DAVIS, State Bar No. 253425 Deputy Attorney General E-mail: Kevin.Davis@doj.ca.gov 2329 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 200 Sacramento, CA 95833-4252 Telephone: (916) 621-1835 Fax: (916) 274-2929 10 Attorneys for State of California 11 (Additional counsel listed on signature page) 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. LLOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR. Plaintiffs, vs. 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. 22 23 Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP Defendants. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. LLOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR., Plaintiffs, Vs. RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. Defendants. Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND COMMUNICATIONS; [PROPOSED ORDER] Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 2 of 4 1 RECITALS 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiff-Intervenor State of California (“California”) served Rule 36 3 Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 on Defendants Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. 4 and Thrifty Payless, Inc. (collectively, “Rite Aid”); 5 WHEREAS, California’s Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 included Requests for 6 Admission Nos. 59-65, which asked Rite Aid to admit that certain documents defined in 7 California’s Requests for Admission as “Pharmacy Records”—which Rite Aid previously 8 produced in this action, and which correspond to the 1,904 sample claim transactions at issue in 9 this action—fall within the scope of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6); 10 WHEREAS, California’s Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 included Request for 11 Admission No. 66, which asked Rite Aid to admit that each Pharmacy Record is authentic within 12 the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 901; 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Pharmacy Records that are subject to this Stipulation (“Pharmacy Records”) are listed separately by Bates number in Exhibit “A” to this Stipulation; WHEREAS, California’s Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 included Request for 16 Admission Nos. 73-87, which asked Rite Aid to admit that certain internal communications 17 produced by Rite Aid in this action—which Rite Aid produced with Bates numbers 18 RAID0000413-RAID0000414, RAID0001404-RAID0001405, RAID0001439-RAID0001440, 19 RAID0000716-RAID0000718 and RAID0001192-RAID0001193 (collectively, the “Code 1 20 Communications”)—are admissible and authentic within the meaning of the Federal Rules of 21 Evidence; 22 WHEREAS, in response to the Requests for Admission specified above, Rite Aid asserted 23 various objections, but proposed that it was willing to enter into a stipulation regarding the 24 subject matter of these Requests; and 25 WHEREAS, Rite Aid, California, and Relator Loyd F. Schmuckley, Jr. (collectively, the 26 “Parties”) enter into this Stipulation to relieve the Parties and the Court from having to devote 27 resources to an evidentiary dispute regarding the authenticity and admissibility of the Pharmacy 28 Records and the Code 1 Communications. 1 Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 3 of 4 STIPULATION 1 2 3 4 NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows: 1. The Parties waive any objection(s) to the admissibility of the Pharmacy Records on the 5 grounds that they do not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 901. 6 2. The Parties waive any objections to the admissibility of the Pharmacy Records on the 7 8 9 10 grounds that they do not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6). 3. The Parties waive any objections to the admissibility of the Code 1 Communications under the Federal Rules of Evidence. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 Respectfully submitted, 12 13 ROB BONTA Attorney General of the State of California 14 15 Dated: August 23, 2021 16 17 By /s/ Kevin Davis Kevin C. Davis Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor STATE OF CALIFORNIA 18 WATERS & KRAUS, LLP 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Dated: August 23, 2021 By /s/ Paul Lawrence (authorized on 8-20-21) Wm. Paul Lawrence, II (Pro hac vice) Washington D.C. Metro Office 37163 Mountville Road Middleburg, VA 20117 Telephone: (540) 687-6999 Fax: (540) 687-5457 E-mail: plawrence@waterskraus.com Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR. 27 28 2 Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 4 of 4 1 MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 2 3 Dated: August 23, 2021 4 5 6 7 8 9 By /s/ Kevin Papay (authorized on 8-23-21) Benjamin P. Smith Kevin M. Papay One Market, Spear Street Tower San Francisco, CA 94105-1596 Telephone: +1.415.442.1000 Fax: +1.415.442.1001 E-mail: Kevin.Papay@morganlewis.com Attorneys for Defendants RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC. 10 11 12 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 30, 2021. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?