Schmuckley et al v. Rite Aid Corporation
Filing
414
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/21 APPROVING 411 Stipulation re Admissibility of Pharmacy Records. (Kaminski, H)
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of California
VINCENT DICARLO
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
BERNICE L. LOUIE YEW, State Bar No. 114601
Deputy Attorney General
Email: Bernice.Yew@doj.ca.gov
EMMANUEL R. SALAZAR, State Bar No. 240794
Deputy Attorney General
E-mail: Emmanuel.Salazar@doj.ca.gov
KEVIN C. DAVIS, State Bar No. 253425
Deputy Attorney General
E-mail: Kevin.Davis@doj.ca.gov
2329 Gateway Oaks Drive, Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95833-4252
Telephone: (916) 621-1835
Fax: (916) 274-2929
10
Attorneys for State of California
11
(Additional counsel listed on signature page)
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., ex rel. LLOYD
F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING
ADMISSIBILITY AND
AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN
RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS
AND COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER
RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID
HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC.
22
23
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP
Defendants.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. LLOYD F.
SCHMUCKLEY, JR.,
Plaintiffs,
Vs.
RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID
HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC.
Defendants.
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP
STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND
COMMUNICATIONS; [PROPOSED ORDER]
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 2 of 4
1
RECITALS
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiff-Intervenor State of California (“California”) served Rule 36
3
Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 on Defendants Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.
4
and Thrifty Payless, Inc. (collectively, “Rite Aid”);
5
WHEREAS, California’s Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 included Requests for
6
Admission Nos. 59-65, which asked Rite Aid to admit that certain documents defined in
7
California’s Requests for Admission as “Pharmacy Records”—which Rite Aid previously
8
produced in this action, and which correspond to the 1,904 sample claim transactions at issue in
9
this action—fall within the scope of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6);
10
WHEREAS, California’s Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 included Request for
11
Admission No. 66, which asked Rite Aid to admit that each Pharmacy Record is authentic within
12
the meaning of Federal Rule of Evidence 901;
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the Pharmacy Records that are subject to this Stipulation (“Pharmacy
Records”) are listed separately by Bates number in Exhibit “A” to this Stipulation;
WHEREAS, California’s Requests for Admission, Set No. 3 included Request for
16
Admission Nos. 73-87, which asked Rite Aid to admit that certain internal communications
17
produced by Rite Aid in this action—which Rite Aid produced with Bates numbers
18
RAID0000413-RAID0000414, RAID0001404-RAID0001405, RAID0001439-RAID0001440,
19
RAID0000716-RAID0000718 and RAID0001192-RAID0001193 (collectively, the “Code 1
20
Communications”)—are admissible and authentic within the meaning of the Federal Rules of
21
Evidence;
22
WHEREAS, in response to the Requests for Admission specified above, Rite Aid asserted
23
various objections, but proposed that it was willing to enter into a stipulation regarding the
24
subject matter of these Requests; and
25
WHEREAS, Rite Aid, California, and Relator Loyd F. Schmuckley, Jr. (collectively, the
26
“Parties”) enter into this Stipulation to relieve the Parties and the Court from having to devote
27
resources to an evidentiary dispute regarding the authenticity and admissibility of the Pharmacy
28
Records and the Code 1 Communications.
1
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP
STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND
COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 3 of 4
STIPULATION
1
2
3
4
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties, by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and
agree as follows:
1. The Parties waive any objection(s) to the admissibility of the Pharmacy Records on the
5
grounds that they do not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 901.
6
2. The Parties waive any objections to the admissibility of the Pharmacy Records on the
7
8
9
10
grounds that they do not meet the requirements of Federal Rule of Evidence 803(6).
3. The Parties waive any objections to the admissibility of the Code 1 Communications
under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
Respectfully submitted,
12
13
ROB BONTA
Attorney General of the State of California
14
15
Dated: August 23, 2021
16
17
By /s/ Kevin Davis
Kevin C. Davis
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Plaintiff-Intervenor STATE OF
CALIFORNIA
18
WATERS & KRAUS, LLP
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Dated: August 23, 2021
By /s/ Paul Lawrence (authorized on 8-20-21)
Wm. Paul Lawrence, II (Pro hac vice)
Washington D.C. Metro Office
37163 Mountville Road
Middleburg, VA 20117
Telephone: (540) 687-6999
Fax: (540) 687-5457
E-mail: plawrence@waterskraus.com
Attorneys for Qui Tam Plaintiff
LOYD F. SCHMUCKLEY, JR.
27
28
2
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP
STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND
COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER
Case 2:12-cv-01699-KJM-JDP Document 414 Filed 08/31/21 Page 4 of 4
1
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
2
3
Dated: August 23, 2021
4
5
6
7
8
9
By /s/ Kevin Papay (authorized on 8-23-21)
Benjamin P. Smith
Kevin M. Papay
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1596
Telephone: +1.415.442.1000
Fax: +1.415.442.1001
E-mail: Kevin.Papay@morganlewis.com
Attorneys for Defendants
RITE AID CORPORATION, RITE AID
HDQTRS. CORP., THRIFTY PAYLESS, INC.
10
11
12
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 30, 2021.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 2:12-cv-1699 KJM JDP
STIPULATION REGARDING ADMISSIBILITY AND AUTHENTICITY OF CERTAIN RITE AID PHARMACY RECORDS AND
COMMUNICATIONS; ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?