County of Amador v. The United States Department of the Interior et al

Filing 6

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/9/12. The court DECLINES to relate cases 2:12-cv-1710 JAM, 2:90-cv-0993 LKK and 2:07-cv-0527 LKK. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

COUNTY OF AMADOR, CALIFORNIA,

12

Plaintiff,
v.

13
14

CIV. NO. S-07-0527 LKK/GGH

THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT
OF THE INTERIOR, et al.,

15
Defendants.
/

16
17

IONE BAND OF MIWOK INDIANS,
et al.,

18

Plaintiffs,

19

v.

20

CIV. NO. S-90-0993 LKK/PAN

HAROLD BURRIS, et al.,
Defendants.

21

/
22
23

////

24

////

25

////

26

////

1

COUNTY OF AMADOR, CALIFORNIA,

2

Plaintiff,

3
4

v.

CIV. NO. S-12-1710 JAM/CKD

THE UNITED STATES DEARPTMENT
OF THE INTERIOR, et al.,

5

NON-RELATED CASE ORDER
Defendants.

6

/

7

Plaintiff has filed a Notice of Related Cases asserting that

8

Civ. No. 2:12-cv-1710-JAM is related to Civ. Nos. 2:90-993-LKK and

9

2:07-cv-527-LKK.

The two latter cases were closed nearly sixteen

10

(16) years ago, on September 4, 1996.

11

relating the cases will not result in a substantial saving of

12

judicial effort, nor avoid duplication of labor, as contemplated

13

by E.D. Cal. R. 123(a)(3) and (4), and the court therefore DECLINES

14

to relate them.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

DATED:

July 9, 2012.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2

The court believes that