Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dorsett et al

Filing 38

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/5/2015 ORDERING that the hearing on Plaintiff's 26 Motin for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 5/6/2015 at 09:30 AM. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 6/19/2015 at 10:00 AM. The Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 8/3/2015 at 09:00 AM. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., 13 Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01715-JAM-EFB ORDER CONTINUING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES DENISE PATTON DORSETT and IRAJ NOUZARI, individually and dba MOONEY'S RESTAURANT & BAR, 17 Defendants. 18 19 The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff, JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., and 20 Defendants, DENISE PATTON DORSETT and IRAJ NOUZARI’s Stipulation to Continue 21 Motion for Summary Judgment, Pre-Trial Conference and Trial Dates, finds that GOOD CAUSE 22 IS HEREBY SHOWN to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, the 23 Final Pre-Trial Conference and the Jury Trial dates associated with the instant matter. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary 24 25 Judgment, the Final Pre-Trial Conference and the Jury Trial should be continued for 26 approximately 90 days as follows: 27 \\\ 28 \\\ D27415F8.doc ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01715-JAM-EFB 1 Event Current Date Stipulated New Date 3 Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment February 11, 2015 9:30 a.m. May 6, 2015 9:30 a.m. 4 Final Pre-Trial Conference March 20, 2015 10:00 a.m. June 19, 2015 10:00 a.m. Jury Trial May 4, 2015 9:00 a.m. August 3, 2015 9:00 a.m. 2 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: February 5, 2015 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ John A. Mendez U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 D27415F8.doc -2- ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01715-JAM-EFB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?