Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Dorsett et al
Filing
38
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/5/2015 ORDERING that the hearing on Plaintiff's 26 Motin for Summary Judgment is CONTINUED to 5/6/2015 at 09:30 AM. The Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED to 6/19/2015 at 10:00 AM. The Jury Trial is CONTINUED to 8/3/2015 at 09:00 AM. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
v.
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01715-JAM-EFB
ORDER CONTINUING
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT, PRE-TRIAL
CONFERENCE AND TRIAL DATES
DENISE PATTON DORSETT and IRAJ
NOUZARI, individually and dba MOONEY'S
RESTAURANT & BAR,
17
Defendants.
18
19
The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff, JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., and
20
Defendants, DENISE PATTON DORSETT and IRAJ NOUZARI’s Stipulation to Continue
21
Motion for Summary Judgment, Pre-Trial Conference and Trial Dates, finds that GOOD CAUSE
22
IS HEREBY SHOWN to continue the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment, the
23
Final Pre-Trial Conference and the Jury Trial dates associated with the instant matter.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
24
25
Judgment, the Final Pre-Trial Conference and the Jury Trial should be continued for
26
approximately 90 days as follows:
27
\\\
28
\\\
D27415F8.doc
ORDER
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01715-JAM-EFB
1
Event
Current Date
Stipulated New Date
3
Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion
for Summary Judgment
February 11, 2015
9:30 a.m.
May 6, 2015
9:30 a.m.
4
Final Pre-Trial Conference
March 20, 2015
10:00 a.m.
June 19, 2015
10:00 a.m.
Jury Trial
May 4, 2015
9:00 a.m.
August 3, 2015
9:00 a.m.
2
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: February 5, 2015
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
John A. Mendez
U. S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
D27415F8.doc
-2-
ORDER
CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01715-JAM-EFB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?