Proof v. Intel Corporation Long Term Disability Plan

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 9/25/2013 ORDERING that all responsive trial briefs shall now be filed on or before 10/1/2013. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Nancy B. Pridgen (pro hac vice)
MONNOLLY | PRIDGEN LLC
3340 Peachtree Road, Suite 1800
Atlanta, Georgia 30326
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Michael W. Pott, SBN 186156
PORTER | SCOTT, P.C.
350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone] ext. 322
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendant
INTEL CORPORATION LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN

10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12

SHELLEY PROOF,

CASE NO. No. 2:12-CV-01716-TLN-CKD

13
Plaintiff,

14
15

TO

vs.

16

STIPULATION AND ORDER
MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE

INTEL CORPORATION LONG TERM
DISABILITY PLAN,

17
18

Complaint Filed: June 28, 2012

Defendant
___________________________________/

19
20

Plaintiff SHELLEY PROOF and Defendant INTEL CORPORATION LONG TERM

21
DISABILITY PLAN hereby respectfully and jointly request the Court modify the briefing
22
23

schedule for the responsive trial briefs for the reasons set forth below.

24

On June 12, 2013, the Court issued a minute order setting this ERISA matter for a half-day

25

bench trial on October 11, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. The minute order requires the parties to file opening

26

trial briefs on or before September 13, 2013 and responsive briefs on or before September 27,

27
28

2013. Each party filed its opening brief on September 13, 2013.

1

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE

National counsel for Defendant, Nancy B. Pridgen, has had a serious health issue1 arise

1
2

and as a result needs a short (two-day) extension to prepare and file Defendant’s responsive brief.

3

Defense Counsel contacted Plaintiff’s counsel, Peter Sessions, and proposed that the parties ask

4

the Court to extend deadline for both parties’ response briefs by two (2) business days, to October

5
6

1, 2013, so as to not disadvantage either party. Plaintiff’s counsel agreed with this proposal.

7

This stipulation does not impact the Bench Trial which remains set for October 11, 2013.

8

IT IS SO STIPULATED:

9

DATED: September 23, 2013

10

KANTOR & KANTOR, LLP
By:

11

PORTER | SCOTT

350 University Ave., Suite 200
Sacramento, CA 95825
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]

12
13

DATED: September 23, 2013

14

/s/ Peter S. Sessions
Peter S. Sessions
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Shelley Proof
MONNOLLY | PRIDGEN LLC

By:

15
16

/s/ Nancy B. Pridgen
Nancy B. Pridgen
Attorneys for Defendant
Intel Corp. LTD Plan

17
18

ORDER

19

Based on the Stipulation of the parties, due date for the filing of responsive trial briefs is

20
changed. All responsive trial briefs shall now be filed on or before October 1, 2013.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED:

22
23

Dated: September 25, 2013

24
25
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1

Defense counsel can and will explain the nature of her serious health issue to the Court’s staff by telephone, if
necessary, but is not comfortable putting specific details in a publicly-accessible document.
2

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY BRIEFING SCHEDULE