Halyday v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/27/13. The Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees in the amount of $4,300.00. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration LYNN M. HARADA, CSBN 267616 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8977 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Lynn.Harada@ssa.gov 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 10 11 12 13 14 15 FRANK B. HALYDAY, Plaintiff, vs. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 16 17 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 2:12-cv-01761-KJN STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 18 19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their undersigned 20 counsel, subject to the Court’s approval, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal 21 Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND, 22 THREE-HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($4,300.00). This amount represents 23 compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with 24 this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). 25 After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government 26 will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff’s 27 attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment 28 will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United 1 States Department of the Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and 2 expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. 3 Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the 4 Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause 5 the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made directly to Ann M. Cerney, pursuant to the 6 assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 7 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA 8 attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of 9 Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release 10 from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to 11 EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. 12 13 This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff’s counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. 14 Respectfully submitted, 15 16 Dated: November 26, 2013 By: 17 18 /s/ Ann M. Cerney (As authorized by email on 11/25/13) ANN M. CERNEY Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 26, 2013 By: /s/ Lynn M. Harada LYNN M. HARADA Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 1 ORDER 2 3 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney 4 fees in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND, THREE-HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO 5 CENTS ($4,300.00), as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above- 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 referenced Stipulation. Dated: November 27, 2013 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?