Smith et al v. Van Dyck et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 10/18/18 GRANTING the final judgment for the United States and the State of California in accordance with this Court's Orders on 2/14/18 (ECF No. 95 ) and 1/20/17 (ECF No. 86 ), and orders Defendants to pay the United States and the State of California damages and civil penalties as set out below within 30 days after the filing of this judgment: 1. For Count I, Defendants shall pay the United States treble damages of $18 7,254.03 for false claims presented to Tricare; 2. For Count I, Defendants shall pay the United States treble damages of $2,862,426.33 for false claims presented to Medicare, plus $11,000.00 in civil penalties per claim for 50 false claims (i.e., $550,000.00), for a total of $3,599,680.33 to be paid to the United States; 3. For Count II, Defendants shall pay the State of California treble damages of $56,181.12, plus $11,000.00 in civil penalties, for false claims p resented to Medi-Cal. The Court further orders that any remaining allegations that were not part of the 2/14/18 Order (ECF No. 95 ) are DISMISSED pursuant to FRCP 41(a) with prejudice as to Relators, and without prejudice to the United States and t he State of California. For Counts III through IV, the Court orders that such Counts are dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a) without prejudice. Notwithstanding this entry of final judgment, this Court retains jurisdiction to enforce its orders in this case. CASE CLOSED. (cc Financial) (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel., NANCY A. SMITH and WENDY S. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 17 No. 2:12-CV-01783-MCE-DB ORDER v. NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM, individually, et al., Defendants. 18 19 Presently before the Court are relators Nancy A. Smith and Wendy S. Johnson 20 (“Relators”) Motion for Entry of Final Judgment (ECF No. 97), the Statement of Non- 21 Opposition by Defendant Neil Alan Van Dyck, DPM (“Defendants”) (ECF No. 99), and 22 the Notice of Consent to Dismissal of Allegations That Were Not Part of the Summary 23 Judgment on Liability filed by the United States (ECF No. 100). Based upon the Court’s 24 consideration of these documents, Relators’ Motion (ECF No. 97) is GRANTED. 25 The Court hereby enters final judgment for the United States and the State of 26 California in accordance with this Court’s Orders on February 14, 2018 (ECF No. 95) 27 and January 20, 2017 (ECF No. 86), and orders Defendants to pay the United States 28 and the State of California damages and civil penalties as set out below within 30 days 1 1 2 after the filing of this judgment: 1. 3 4 For Count I, Defendants shall pay the United States treble damages of $187,254.03 for false claims presented to Tricare; 2. For Count I, Defendants shall pay the United States treble damages of 5 $2,862,426.33 for false claims presented to Medicare, plus $11,000.00 in 6 civil penalties per claim for 50 false claims (i.e., $550,000.00), for a total of 7 $3,599,680.33 to be paid to the United States; 8 9 10 11 3. For Count II, Defendants shall pay the State of California treble damages of $56,181.12, plus $11,000.00 in civil penalties, for false claims presented to Medi-Cal. The Court further orders that any remaining allegations that were not part of the 12 February 14, 2018 Order (ECF No. 95) are DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 13 Procedure 41(a) with prejudice as to Relators, and without prejudice to the United States 14 and the State of California. For Counts III through IV, the Court orders that such Counts 15 are dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a) without prejudice. 16 17 18 19 Notwithstanding this entry of final judgement, this Court retains jurisdiction to enforce its orders in this case. The Clerk of the Court is directed to CLOSE this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18, 2018 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?