Smith et al v. Van Dyck et al
Filing
68
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/5/2016 CONTINUING the Pretrial Scheduling Conference to 8/22/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Michel, G.)
1
5
MICHAEL J. KHOURI, ESQ. [SBN 97654]
Email:
mkhouri@khourilaw.com
ANDREW B. GOODMAN, ESQ. [SBN 267972]
Email:
agoodman@khourilaw.com
KHOURI LAW FIRM
4040 Barranca Parkway, Suite 280
Irvine, California 92604
Telephone: (949) 336-2433
Fax:
(949) 387-0044
6
Attorneys for defendant NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM
2
3
4
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and
THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel.
NANCY A. SMITH and WENDY S.
JOHNSON,
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 2:12-cv-01783-GEB-DB
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING STIPULATION TO
CONTINUE PRETRIAL
SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
TO AUGUST 22, 2016
Plaintiffs,
vs.
[Stipulation submitted concurrently]
NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM;
NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM, INC.; Second Amended Complaint filed:
and DOES 1 THROUGH 25, inclusive, April 25, 2016
Defendants.
Status conference: August 15, 2016
Time: 9:00 AM
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
Defendant NEIL A. VAN DYCK (“Van Dyck”) and qui tam plaintiffs
2
NANCY A. SMITH and WENDY S. JOHNSON (“Relators”) (collectively Van
3
Dyck and Relators are the “Parties”), by and through their attorneys of record,
4
stipulated that the pretrial scheduling conference, currently scheduled for August
5
15, 2016 at 9:00 AM, shall be continued to August 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM.
6
Based on the stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing,
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial scheduling conference
8
currently scheduled for August 15, 2016 at 9:00 AM, shall be continued to August
9
22, 2016 at 9:00 AM.
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
12
Dated: August 5, 2016
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?