Smith et al v. Van Dyck et al

Filing 68

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/5/2016 CONTINUING the Pretrial Scheduling Conference to 8/22/2016 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 5 MICHAEL J. KHOURI, ESQ. [SBN 97654] Email: mkhouri@khourilaw.com ANDREW B. GOODMAN, ESQ. [SBN 267972] Email: agoodman@khourilaw.com KHOURI LAW FIRM 4040 Barranca Parkway, Suite 280 Irvine, California 92604 Telephone: (949) 336-2433 Fax: (949) 387-0044 6 Attorneys for defendant NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM 2 3 4 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. NANCY A. SMITH and WENDY S. JOHNSON, 14 15 16 17 18 19 Case No. 2:12-cv-01783-GEB-DB [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE TO AUGUST 22, 2016 Plaintiffs, vs. [Stipulation submitted concurrently] NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM; NEIL ALAN VAN DYCK, DPM, INC.; Second Amended Complaint filed: and DOES 1 THROUGH 25, inclusive, April 25, 2016 Defendants. Status conference: August 15, 2016 Time: 9:00 AM 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Defendant NEIL A. VAN DYCK (“Van Dyck”) and qui tam plaintiffs 2 NANCY A. SMITH and WENDY S. JOHNSON (“Relators”) (collectively Van 3 Dyck and Relators are the “Parties”), by and through their attorneys of record, 4 stipulated that the pretrial scheduling conference, currently scheduled for August 5 15, 2016 at 9:00 AM, shall be continued to August 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM. 6 Based on the stipulation of the Parties and good cause appearing, 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the pretrial scheduling conference 8 currently scheduled for August 15, 2016 at 9:00 AM, shall be continued to August 9 22, 2016 at 9:00 AM. 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: August 5, 2016 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?