HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Nyhan

Filing 14

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 4/9/13 RECOMMENDING that the 10 Motion for Default Judgment be granted in the amount of $10,225.08 plus prejudgment interest from 8/21/12 to the date of judgment at a rate of $0.71 per day, plus post-judgment interest as specified in plaintiff's proposed judgment which is approved as to form and substance. Motion referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORP., 11 12 Plaintiff, No. 2:12-cv-1798 TLN GGH vs. 13 14 ELENA NYHAN, aka ELENA MATHEW, FINDINGS & 15 16 Defendant. ___________________________/ RECOMMENDATIONS 17 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment against defendant Elena Nyhan, 18 also known as Elena Mathew, filed October 8, 2012, was submitted on the record. Local Rule 19 230(g). Upon review of the motion and the supporting documents, and good cause appearing, 20 the court issues the following findings and recommendations. 21 BACKGROUND 22 On July 6, 2012, plaintiff filed the underlying complaint in this action against 23 defendant Nyhan, alleging that Nyhan defaulted on her federally guaranteed HEAL student loans. 24 HICA Education Loan Corporation’s claim for default seeks recovery of the amounts due and 25 owing under three notes, as well as other costs and charges arising out of the default. The 26 summons and complaint were personally served on defendant Nyhan on July 19, 2012. Fed. R. 1 1 Civ. P. 4(e)(2). Pacific Atlantic Trading Co. v. M/V Main Express, 758 F.2d 1325, 1331 (9th 2 Cir. 1985) (default judgment void without personal jurisdiction). Defendant Nyhan has failed to 3 file an answer or otherwise appear in this action. On September 6, 2012 the clerk entered default 4 against defendant Nyhan. 5 Notice of the request for entry of default and the instant motion for default 6 judgment and supporting papers were served by mail on defendant Nyhan at her last known 7 address. Defendant Nyhan filed no opposition to the motion for entry of default judgment. 8 Plaintiff seeks an entry of default judgment against defendant Nyhan in the amount of 9 $10,225.08, with additional prejudgment interest from August 21, 2012 to the date of judgment 10 at a rate of $0.71 per day, plus post-judgment interest. 11 DISCUSSION 12 The court has subject matter jurisdiction over this federal question action. HICA 13 Educ. Loan Corp. v. Eslao, 2012 WL 1413373 (N.D. Cal., 2012); HICA Educ. Loan Corp, 2011 14 WL 3515911 (D.N.J. 2011). Personal jurisdiction is appropriate as defendant was served at her 15 ostensible residence in Truckee, CA. 16 Entry of default effects an admission of all well-pleaded allegations of the 17 complaint by the defaulted party. Geddes v. United Financial Group, 559 F.2d 557 (9th Cir. 18 1977). The court finds the well pleaded allegations of the complaint state a claim for which 19 relief can be granted. Anderson v. Air West, 542 F.2d 1090, 1093 (9th Cir. 1976). The 20 memorandum of points and authorities and affidavits filed in support of the motion for entry of 21 default judgment also support the finding that plaintiff is entitled to the relief requested. There 22 are no policy considerations which preclude the entry of default judgment of the type requested. 23 See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-1472 (9th Cir. 1986). 24 After determining that entry of default judgment is warranted, the court must next 25 determine the terms of the judgment. Plaintiff seeks $10,225.08 which is comprised of 26 \\\\\ 2 1 $9,214.09 in unpaid principal,1 and $1,010.99 in unpaid interest as of August 20, 2012. 2 Zimmerman Decl., ¶¶ 2-4. Plaintiff also seeks interest in the amount of $0.71 per day from 3 August 20, 2012 until the date of judgment, as well as interest from the date of judgment until the 4 judgment is paid at a rate calculated by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human 5 Services. See Compl. ¶ 11, n. 3, Exs. 1-3. The court finds the requested sums to be appropriate. 6 This court will recommend that plaintiff’s request for default judgment be granted in accordance 7 with terms set forth in plaintiff’s proposed judgment. 8 CONCLUSION 9 In view of the foregoing findings, it is the recommendation of this court that: 10 Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default judgment be GRANTED in the amount of $10,225.08, plus 11 prejudgment interest from August 21, 2012 to the date of judgment at a rate of $0.71 per day, 12 plus post-judgment interest as specified in plaintiff’s proposed judgment which is approved as to 13 form and substance. 14 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 15 Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 16 fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file 17 written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be 18 captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the 19 objections shall be served and filed within seven days after service of the objections. The parties 20 \\\\\ 21 \\\\\ 22 \\\\\ 23 \\\\\ 24 25 26 1 The unpaid principal exceeds the original amounts of the notes because it includes interest previously accrued and not paid, which is permitted to be added to the principal. See 42 U.S.C. § 292d(a)(2)(D). 3 1 are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal 2 the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 DATED: April 9, 2013 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 GGH:076/HICA.1798.def.wpd 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?