Blackshire v. Sacramento Regional Transit
Filing
22
ORDER ADOPTING 19 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/15/2015. Plaintiff's 5/26/2015 17 Motion to Reopen Case is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
PATRICK BLACKSHIRE,
7
Plaintiff,
8
9
v.
No. 2:12-cv-1803 JAM GGH PS
ORDER
SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT,
10
Defendant.
11
12
13
14
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On August 5, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
15
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
16
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 19) Plaintiff has
17
not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
18
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
19
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
20
ORDERED that:
21
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 5, 2015, are adopted in full; and
22
2. Plaintiff’s May 26, 2016 motion to reopen his case (ECF No. 17) is denied.
23
DATED: October 15, 2015
24
/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________
25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?