Johnson v. Reddy et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/19/13 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND LEON JOHNSON, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. SHANKARI REDDY, M.D., et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 17 No. 2:12-cv-1843 KJN P On March 22, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has not opposed the motion. 18 Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written 19 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 20 the granting of the motion . . . .” Id. On December 21, 2012, plaintiff was advised of the 21 requirements for filing an opposition to a motion and that failure to oppose such a motion may be 22 deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. Moreover, contemporaneous with the filing of the 23 motion, defendants provided notice of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion to 24 dismiss pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1120 n.14 (9th Cir. 2003). (Dkt. No. 16- 25 2.) 26 //// 1 1 Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 2 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 3 inherent power of the Court.” In the order filed December 21, 2012, plaintiff was also advised 4 that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation that the action be 5 dismissed. 6 Finally, Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides: 7 Involuntary Dismissal; Effect. If the plaintiff fails to prosecute or to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any claim against it. Unless the dismissal order states otherwise, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not under this rule--except one for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19--operates as an adjudication on the merits. 8 9 10 11 Id. 12 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty days of the 13 date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to the motion to dismiss. Failure to file 14 an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the: (a) pending motion granted; (b) action 15 dismissed for lack of prosecution; and (c) action dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to comply 16 with these rules and a court order. Such failure shall result in a recommendation that this action 17 be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 18 DATED: April 19, 2013 19 20 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 john1843.46o 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?