California Parks and Recreation v. Newmont Mining Corporation et al

Filing 51

ORDER entering the Stipulation clarifying the scope of the parties' alleged claim/counterclaim for contribution, signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/2/14. (Kastilahn, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
DANIEL L. SIEGEL, State Bar No. 67536
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
RUSSELL B. HILDRETH, State Bar No. 166167
NICOLE U. RINKE, State Bar No. 257510
JESSICA E. TUCKER-MOHL, State Bar No. 262280
Deputy Attorneys General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant
California Department of Parks and Recreation

9
10
11
12
13
14

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Michael G. Romey (Bar No. 137993)
Andrea M. Hogan (Bar No. 238209)
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail];
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS &
RECREATION,
Plaintiff,
v.
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION; et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________
NEWMONT MINING CORPORATION; et al.,
Counterclaimants,

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-01857-LKK-AC
ORDER ENTERING STIPULATION
CLARIFYING THE SCOPE OF THE
PARTIES’ ALLEGED
CLAIM/COUNTERCLAIM FOR
CONTRIBUTION
Judge:
Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton
Trial Date: February 3, 2015
Action Filed: July 13, 2012

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS &
RECREATION,
Counterdefendant.

28
Case Number: 2:12-cv-01857-LKK-AC
[Proposed] Order Entering Stipulation Clarifying Section
113 Claim/Counterclaim

1

On June 27, 2014, the California Department of Parks & Recreation (“Parks”) and

2

Newmont Mining Corporation, New Verde Mines LLC, Newmont USA Limited, Newmont

3

North America Exploration Limited and Newmont Realty Company (“Newmont”) (collectively,

4

the “Parties”) submitted a Stipulation Clarifying the Scope of the Parties’ Alleged

5

Claim/Counterclaim for Contribution (Doc. No. 47) (the “Stipulation”).

6

Upon consideration of the Stipulation and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY

7

ORDERED that the Stipulation be entered.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated: July 2, 2014.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case Number: 2:12-cv-01857-LKK-AC

1 [Proposed] Order Entering Stipulation Clarifying Section

113 Claim/Counterclaim