Friends of Tahoe Forest Access et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/6/14 DENYING 31 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and GRANTING 32 Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment for the reasons stated in the transcript of the proceedings held on 48 . Accordingly, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment in favor of defendants and against plaintiffs. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
ROBERT G. DREHER
Acting Assistant Attorney General
Environment and Natural Resources Div.
BEVERLY F. LI
Trial Attorney
Natural Resources Section
Environment and Natural Resources Div.
U.S. Dept. of Justice
P.O. Box 7611
Washington, D.C. 20044-7611
Tel: 202-353-9213
Fax: 202-305-0506
Beverly.Li@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
FRIENDS OF TAHOE FOREST ACCESS,
et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE, et al.,
Defendants.
) Civ. No. 12-01876-JAM-CKD
)
)
)
)
)
) ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ CROSS) MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
)
)
)
This matter comes before the Court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment.
ECF Nos. 31, 32. Upon consideration of the administrative record, parties’ briefs, and oral
argument presented on November 22, 2013, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 31) and GRANTS Defendants’ cross-motion for summary
judgment (ECF No. 32) for the reasons stated in the transcript of the proceedings held on
November 22, 2013 (ECF No. 48). Accordingly, the Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor
of Defendants and against Plaintiffs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?