California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Redding

Filing 29

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/30/16 ORDERING the consent decree has now expired. The parties are now ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE within seven days why this case should not be closed. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE,
Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:12-cv-01884-KJM-KJN

ORDER
v.
CITY OF REDDING,
Defendant.

16
17
18

On July 9, 2013, the judge previously assigned to this matter approved a proposed

19

consent decree, which provided for final settlement of the case. ECF No. 22. Under the terms of

20

the consent decree, the court retained jurisdiction over the parties to enforce its terms if necessary,

21

and the decree expired June 28, 2016. ECF No. 20 at 5–6. On January 14, 2016, after the case

22

was reassigned to the undersigned, the undersigned ordered the parties to show cause why the

23

case should not be closed. ECF No. 26. Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance

24

(CSPA) responded on January 21, 2016, and requested the court not close the case until defendant

25

City of Redding satisfied its obligations under the consent decree and the consent decree expired.

26

ECF No. 27. at 1.

27
28

The consent decree has now expired. The parties are now ORDERED TO SHOW
CAUSE within seven days why this case should not be closed.
1

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 30, 2016

3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2