Joseph v. Smith et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/28/2013 DENYING plaintiff's 10 motion. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALONZO JOSEPH,

12

No. 2:12-CV-1935-CMK-P

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

C. SMITH, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16

/

17

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983.

Pending before the court is plaintiff’s document entitled “Motion to Amend

19

These Exhibits” (Doc. 10). In his motion, plaintiff seeks leave to submit additional exhibits in

20

support of his motion for appointment of counsel. Because plaintiff’s motion for appointment of

21

counsel has been denied, the instant request is now moot.1

22

///

23

///

24
1

25
26

To the extent the court may not have considered the documentation attached to the
current motion when it considered plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, the court has reexamined both the motion and the exhibits and does not find that reconsideration of the order
denying appointment of counsel is warranted.
1

1
2

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (Doc. 10) is
denied.

3
4
5
6

DATED: February 28, 2013
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2