Girley v. Swarthout

Filing 42

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/3/14 denying without prejudice 40 Motion ; Petitioner is granted twenty-one days in which to file a reply to respondents answer. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DOUGLAS DWAYNE GIRLEY, 12 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-1938 KJM KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER GARY SWARTHOUT, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas 18 corpus. On February 28, 2014, petitioner’s motion for stay and to amend was denied, and 19 petitioner was granted thirty days in which to file a reply to respondent’s answer. On March 27, 20 2014, under the mailbox rule, petitioner filed a document addressed to the San Joaquin County 21 Superior Court and styled, “Petition for Rehearing Request for DNA Testing.” (ECF No. 40.) 22 The filing is directed to the judge of the San Joaquin County Superior Court and the District 23 Attorney, and petitioner seeks “rehearing and reconsideration of its opinion March 7, 2012.” 24 (ECF No. 40.) 25 It appears petitioner mailed the March 27, 2012 filing to the wrong court. No opinion 26 issued from this court on or about March 7, 2012; indeed, this action was not opened until July 27 24, 2012. Moreover, the claims contained in the petition do not relate to DNA evidence. (ECF 28 No. 1.) If petitioner seeks rehearing or reconsideration of an opinion issued by the San Joaquin 1 1 County Superior Court, petitioner should file his motion in the San Joaquin County Superior 2 Court. In an abundance of caution, petitioner will be granted an additional twenty-one days in 3 which to file a reply to respondent’s answer. 4 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 5 1. Petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 40) is denied without prejudice; and 6 2. Petitioner is granted twenty-one days in which to file a reply to respondent’s answer. 7 Dated: April 3, 2014 8 9 /girl1938.eot 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?