Herrera v. Fleming, et al
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/10/13 GRANTING 21 Motion to the extent that plaintiffs amended complaint is due 30 days from the date of this order. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ROBERTO HERRERA,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
No. 2:12-cv-1965 WBS EFB P
vs.
B. FLEMING, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
17
U.S.C. § 1983. On October 24, 2012, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state
18
a claim. The court explained the complaint’s deficiencies, gave plaintiff 30 days to file an
19
amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an
20
amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Plaintiff
21
now seeks a second extension of time to amend his complaint, explaining that he cannot amend
22
his complaint without a copy of his gang validation packet.
23
The court will grant plaintiff one final extension of time to file an amended complaint.
24
He is reminded that filing an amended complaint should not require extensive research and does
25
not require that he first obtain his gang validation packet. To file an amended complaint in
26
accordance with the court’s screening order, plaintiff need only submit a short and plain
1
1
statement of his claim showing that he is entitled to relief. An amended complaint should not
2
include legal citations and should need not contain unnecessarily detailed factual allegations.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s January 7, 2013 motion (Dckt.
4
No. 21) is granted to the extent that plaintiff’s amended complaint is due thirty days from the
5
date of this order. Failure to so comply may result in a recommendation that this action be
6
dismissed.
7
Dated: January 10, 2013.
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?