United States v. Laughlin et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 11/5/13 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 10/4/13 36 are ADOPTED and The government's MOTION to STRIKE and to dismiss second counterclaim, filed 5/13/13 29 , is GRANTED in part; Defendants' counter-claim, filed 4/22/13 28 , is STRIKEN and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the default of defendants Robert Laughlin and Barbra Laughlin. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
13
Plaintiff,
14
15
No. 2:12-cv-1990 MCE GGH PS
v.
ORDER
ROBERT S. LAUGHLIN, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
On October 4, 2013, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
18
19
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings
20
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
21
22
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
23
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
24
1983).
25
26
27
28
The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed October 4,
2013 (ECF No. 36), are ADOPTED and
1
1
2
1. The government’s motion to strike and to dismiss second counterclaim, filed May 13,
2013, (ECF No. 29), is GRANTED in part;
3
2. Defendants’ counter-claim, filed April 22, 2013 (ECF No. 28), is stricken and the
4
Clerk of the Court is directed to enter the default of defendants Robert Laughlin and Barbra
5
Laughlin.
6
Dated: November 5, 2013
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?