Dilliehunt et al v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Filing 19

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/13/2013 DISMISSING CASE in its entirety without prejudice; ORDERING each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 HARVEY P. SACKETT 2 3 4 5 1055 Lincoln Avenue Post Office Box 5025 San Jose, California 95150-5025 Telephone: (408) 295-7755 Facsimile: (408) 295-7444 6 7 /jgl 8 Attorney for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 12 13 SHONDRA R. DILLIEHUNT, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 CAROLYN W. COLVIN,1 Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 17 18 Defendant. 19 ) No.: 2:12-cv-02013 AC ) ) ) ) STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR ) DISMISSAL ) ) ) ) ) ) 20 Plaintiff and Defendant, through their respective attorneys, hereby stipulate that this 21 22 matter be dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. Each party shall bear their own attorney's 23 fees and costs. 24 25 26 27 28 1 Carolyn W. Colvin became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on February 14, 2013. Pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Carolyn W. Colvin should be substituted for Commissioner Michael J. Astrue as Defendant in this suit. No further action need be taken to continue this suit by reason of the last sentence of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g). STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 1 2 3 4 Dated: June 12, 2013 /s/THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS THEOPHOUS H. REAGANS Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Social Security Administration Attorney for the Defendant Dated: June 13, 2013 5 /s/HARVEY P. SACKETT HARVEY P. SACKETT Attorney for Plaintiff SHONDRA R. DILLIEHUNT 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 Dated: June 13, 2013 ` ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?