Johnson v. Ruffaine et al

Filing 32

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 11/14/2012 re: 31 Stipulation and Proposed Order ORDERING that Defendants Jagjit Singh Saini Individually and d/b/a Vics Discount Market; Sukhpreet Kaur Saini Individually and d/b/a Vics Discount Market shall have until November 23, 2012 to respond to complaint. (Waggoner, D)

4

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
E-MAIL [e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

1
2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

Plaintiff,

14

vs.

15
16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Scott N. Johnson

John Ruffaine, et al,
Defendants

17
18
19

Case No.2:12-cv-02091-WBS-EFB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL
NOVEMBER 23, 2012 FOR
DEFENDANTS JAGJIT SINGH SAINI
INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A VIC’S
DISCOUNT MARKET; SUKHPREET KAUR
SAINI INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A
VIC’S DISCOUNT MARKET TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

20
21

Pursuant

to

Local

Rule

6-144

(a),

Plaintiff

Scott

N.

22

Johnson and Defendants, Jagjit Singh Saini Individually and

23

d/b/a

Vic’s

Discount

Market;

Sukhpreet

Kaur

Saini

24

Individually

and

d/b/a

Vic’s

Discount

Market,

by

and

Scott

N.

25

through

their

respective

attorneys

of

record,

26
27

Johnson; Lyne Richardson, stipulate as follows:

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

1. No extension of time has been previously
1

obtained.

2
3

2. Defendants Jagjit Singh Saini Individually and

4

d/b/a Vic’s Discount Market; Sukhpreet Kaur

5

Saini Individually and d/b/a Vic’s Discount
6

Market are granted an extension until November
7
8

23, 2012 to respond or otherwise plead

9

reference to Plaintiff’s complaint.

10

3. Defendants Jagjit Singh Saini Individually and

11

d/b/a Vic’s Discount Market; Sukhpreet Kaur
12

Saini Individually and d/b/a Vic’s Discount
13
14

Market response will be due no later than

15

November 23, 2012.

16
17

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of November 13, 2012

18
19
20

Dated:

November 13, 2012

/s/Lyne Richardson__ ___

21

Lyne Richardson,

22

Attorney for Defendants

23

Jagjit Singh Saini

24

Individually and d/b/a
25
26
27

Vic’s Discount Market;
Sukhpreet Kaur Saini

28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

Individually and d/b/a
1

Vic’s Discount Market

2
3
4

Dated:

November 13, 2012

/s/Scott N. Johnson ____

5

Scott N. Johnson,
6

Attorney for Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendants Jagjit Singh Saini
Individually
Kaur

Saini

and

d/b/a

Individually

Vic’s
and

Discount
d/b/a

Market;

Vic’s

Sukhpreet

Discount

Market

shall have until November 23, 2012 to respond to complaint.

13
14
Dated: November 14, 2012
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 3