Hill v. Biter
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 03/16/15 ordering petitioner's proposed substitution of counsel is granted. Joseph J. Wiseman is substituted for Donald T. Bergerson as attorney of record for petitioner in this case. Petitioner shall file a traverse within 60 days of the filed date of this order, absent further order of court. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
CERON HILL,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-2098 MCE DAD P
v.
ORDER
MARTIN D. BITER,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of
18
habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed an answer to the petition on
19
February 13, 2014. Thereafter, petitioner’s counsel of record requested and received extensions
20
of time to file a traverse. Despite the granting of extensions of time, no traverse was filed.
21
Petitioner has now submitted a proposed substitution of counsel to which his current counsel of
22
record has stipulated. (Doc. No. 52.) The proposed substitution of counsel will be allowed and
23
petitioner’s new counsel will be granted sixty days within which to file a traverse. After the
24
traverse is filed, this matter will stand submitted for decision.
25
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
26
1. Petitioner’s proposed substitution of counsel is granted. Joseph J. Wiseman, CSBN
27
107403, Wiseman Law Group, 1477 Drew Avenue, Suite 106, Davis, California 95618,
28
/////
1
1
530.759.0700, is substituted for Donald T. Bergerson as attorney of record for petitioner in this
2
case; and
3
2. Petitioner shall file a traverse within 60 days of the filed date of this order, absent
4
further order of court.
5
Dated: March 16, 2015
6
7
8
DAD: 8
hill2098.sub
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?