Hill v. Biter

Filing 57

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/26/2015 ORDERING respondent to file, within 30 days, an opposition to petitioner's 55 request to expand the record.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CERON HILL, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:12-CV-2098 MCE DAD P Petitioner, v. ORDER MARTIN D. BITER, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed an answer to the petition on 19 February 13, 2014. Thereafter, despite receiving numerous extensions of time, petitioner’s 20 counsel of record failed to file a traverse. Accordingly, by order dated March 17, 2015, 21 petitioner’s motion for substitution of counsel was granted and Joseph J. Wiseman appeared as 22 petitioner’s new retained counsel of record. In that same order, petitioner was directed to file a 23 traverse within 60 days. 24 On May 14, 2015, petitioner filed a traverse. He also filed a separate request to expand 25 the record to “at least” include a declaration from petitioner, which provides additional facts in 26 support of his habeas claim that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance during the plea 27 bargaining stage of these proceedings. Petitioner’s motion to expand the record was not set for 28 hearing on this court’s calendar, as required by Local Rule 230(b). However, this court has 1 1 recently been advised through the courtroom deputy of the undersigned that the parties would like 2 the court to set a hearing on petitioner’s motion. 3 Good cause appearing, respondent will be ordered to file a response to petitioner’s motion 4 to expand the record within thirty days from the filed date of this order. After receiving the 5 opposition, this court will determine whether a hearing is required on the motion and will notify 6 the parties accordingly. 7 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date of this order, 8 respondent shall file an opposition to petitioner’s request to expand the record (ECF No. 55.) 9 Dated: May 26, 2015 10 11 12 13 DAD:8 Hill2098.o 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?