Herron v. Best Buy Co. Inc. et al

Filing 182

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/6/2016 GRANTING 179 Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing the Plaintiff's Deadline to File an Amended Motion for Class Certification; ORDERING the plaintiff to file an Amended Motion fo r Class Certification by 6/24/2016; ORDERING Defendant Best Buy Stores, L.P. to file and serve an opposition to the plaintiff's Amended Motion for Class Certification fourteen (14) days prior to the continued hearing date; ORDERING the plaintiff to file a reply in support of the Amended Motion for Class Certification seven (7) days prior to the continued hearing date. (Michel, G.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12
13
14

CHAD HERRON, individually, on behalf of
himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

vs.
BEST BUY STORES, LP, a Virginia limited
partnership,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02103-TLN-CKD
CLASS ACTION
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE
DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED
MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION FROM MAY 27, 2016
TO JUNE 24, 2016
Judge: Troy L. Nunley

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE
AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
ORDER TO CONTINUE DATES BY 30 DAYS

1

Having reviewed the Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Plaintiff’s Deadline

2

to File Amended Motion for Class Certification from May 27, 2016 to June 24, 2016, and good

3

cause appearing,

4

It is hereby ORDERED that:

5

(1) Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for an Order Continuing Plaintiff’s Deadline to File

6

Amended Motion for Class Certification from May 27, 2016 to June 24, 2016 is GRANTED;
(2) Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Class Certification shall be due on or before June 24,

7
8
9

2016;
(3) Defendant Best Buy Stores, L.P. shall file an opposition to Plaintiff’s Amended

10

Motion for Class Certification in accordance with Local Rule 230(c), making it due and served

11

not less than fourteen (14) days preceding the continued hearing date ; and

12

(4) Plaintiff shall file a reply to Plaintiff’s Amended Motion for Class Certification in

13

accordance with Local Rule 230(d), making it due and served not less than seven (7) days

14

preceding the continued hearing date.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17

Dated: May 6, 2016

18
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO FILE
AMENDED MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION