Lee v. Whitten, et al

Filing 40

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/19/13: This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California THOMAS S. PATTERSON, State Bar No. 168141 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KEVIN A. VOTH, State Bar No. 257227 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-1624 Facsimile: (415) 703-5843 E-mail: Kevin.Voth@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants A. Whitten and W. Sheldon 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 Case No. 2:12-CV-02104 TLN KJN GEORGE LEE, STIPULATION FOR VOLUNTARY Plaintiff, DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE (Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 13 14 v. 15 16 A. WHITTEN, et al., Defendants. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff George Lee and Defendants A. Whitten and W. Sheldon have resolved this case in its entirety. Therefore, the parties stipulate to a dismissal of this action with prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear its own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. It is so stipulated. /// /// /// 1 Dated: 11/22/13 /s/ George Lee Plaintiff George Lee 2 3 4 Dated: 11/22/13 5 6 7 /s/ Kevin A. Voth Kevin A. Voth Deputy Attorney General California Attorney General's Office Attorney for Defendants A. Whitten and W. Sheldon 8 9 10 In accordance with the parties' stipulation, this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 Dated: December 19, 2013 13 14 15 16 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 /whit2104.dsm

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?