Barron v. Superior Court of California County of Solano et al

Filing 14

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/30/13 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ROBERT J. BARRON, III,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

v.

No. 2:12-cv-02108 KJM DAD P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

By order filed August 22, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave

19

to file an amended complaint was granted. In addition, plaintiff was ordered to file within thirty

20

days a new application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certified copy of his trust account

21

statement. Thirty days from the date of the order have now passed and plaintiff has not filed an

22

amended complaint, his in forma pauperis application and trust account statement, or otherwise

23

responded to the court’s order.

24
25

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

3

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

4

(9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: September 30, 2013

6
7
8

DAD:4
bar2108.fta-ifp

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2