Moore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.,

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/26/2012 ORDERING 11 the Proposed FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are ADOPTED; REMANDING CASE to Superior Court of the State of California, County of Placer; and Wells Fargo's 6 Motion to dismiss and plaintiff's motion to amend are DENIED as MOOT; (Copy of remand order sent to other court). CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

GREGORY M. MOORE,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14
15

No. 2:12-cv-2125-LKK-EFB PS

vs.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.;
CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE
CORPORATION; DOES 1-20, inclusive,
Defendants.
__________________________________/

ORDER

16
On September 24, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations

17
18

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the

19

findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,

20
21

concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

22

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

23

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed September 24, 2012, are

24
25
26

ADOPTED;
2. The above-captioned case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of the State
of California in and for the County of Placer; and
1

1

3. Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss, Dckt. No. 6, and plaintiff’s motion to amend,

2

Dckt. No. 10, are denied as moot.

3

DATED: October 26, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2