Dodson v. Petsmart, Inc. et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION and ORDER 17 for extension of time signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 11/7/2012. Defendant PetSmart shall have until 11/9/2012 to respond to 1 Complaint. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3

JOHN M. JULIUS III, Bar No. 112640
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
501 W. Broadway, Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone:
619.232.0441
Facsimile:
619.232.4302

4
5
6
7
8

MICHAEL G. LEGGIERI, Bar No. 253791
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916.830.7244
Facsimile:
916.848.0200
Attorneys for Defendant
PETSMART, INC.

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

14
15

ROBERT DODSON,

16

Plaintiff,

17

v.

18

Case No. 12cv2144 GEB (JFM)
STIPULATION FOR 3-DAY EXTENSION
OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT PETSMART,
INC. TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

PETSMART, INC. dba PETSMART
#0048; THEODORE P. KOROS,
TRUSTEE OF THE KOROS FAMILY
TRUST UNDER AGREEMETN DATED
MAY 8, 2012; ANGELA R. KOROS,
TRUSTEE of the KOROS FAMILY
TRUST UNDER AGREEMENT DATED
MAY 8, 2012; SOPHIA PETER KELLEY;
THOMAS KOROS; NICHOLAS KOROS;
PETER T. KOROS, TRUSTEE of the
KOROS FAMILY TRUST u/d/t DATED
JANUARY 25, 1988; ELENI P. KOROS,
TRUSTEE u/d/t DATED JANUARY 25,
1988,

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Defendants.

27
28
LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION
501 W. Broadway
Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101. 3577
619.232.0441

STIPULATION AND ORDER

12cv2144

1

Plaintiff Robert Dodson ("Dodson") and Defendant PetSmart, Inc. dba PetSmart #0048

2

(“PetSmart”), hereby stipulate to a 3-day extension of time so that PetSmart shall have until

3

November 9, 2012, to respond to the Complaint. PetSmart's response is currently due today,

4

November 6, 2012. Good cause exists for this extension because the parties have discussed the

5

alleged access barriers listed in the Complaint and believe that an agreement to resolve the ADA

6

access claims against PetSmart is imminent. In particular, permitting this short extension of time to

7

respond to the Complaint will allow PetSmart to avoid the cost of preparing and filing a response if,

8

as expected, the parties are able to finalize an agreement to resolve Dodson's claims against

9

PetSmart.

10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

11
12

Dated: November 6, 2012

13
14

By: /s/ Lynn Hubbard, III
LYNN HUBBARD, III
DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP,
APLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ROBERT DODSON

15
16
17
18

Dated: November 6, 2012

19
By: /s/ Michael G. Leggieri
MICHAEL G. LEGGIERI
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
Attorneys for Defendant
PETSMART, INC.

20
21
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24

Date: 11/7/2012
___________________________________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge

25
26
27
28

DEAC_Signature-END:

61khh4bb

LITTLE R MEND ELSO N, P .C .
A PROF E S SION AL C ORP OR A TION
501 W. Broadway
Suite 900
San Diego, CA 92101. 3577
619.232.0441

STIPULATION AND ORDER

1.

12cv2144