Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 20

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/2/2013 GRANTING 19 Motion to Stay. The stay of the action shall be automatically lifted when the lapse in appropriations has ended, without further order of the court. The Commissioner's cross-motion for summary judgment will be due within seven (7) days thereafter. In light of the extenuating circumstances, the court will entertain a stipulation for an additional extension of time, if necessary. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BENJAMIN B.WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI, CSBN 256770 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105-2102 Telephone: (415) 977-8961 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: cynthia.denardi@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 12 13 14 SAMMIE D. HERNANDEZ, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 18 19 Defendant. 20 21 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:12-cv-2150-KJN ORDER RE MOTION FOR A STAY OF PROCEEDINGS IN LIGHT OF LAPSE OF APPROPRIATIONS The Acting Commissioner of Social Security hereby moves for a stay of proceedings in the above-captioned case until Congress has restored appropriations. 1. At the end of the day on September 30, 2013, the Appropriations Act that had been funding the Department of Justice expired and appropriations to the Department lapsed. 25 26 27 The same is true for most Executive agencies, including the Social Security Administration. The Department does not know when funding will be restored by Congress. 28 1 Order re Motion for a Stay of Proceedings, 2:12-cv-2150-KJN 2. 1 2 3 Absent an appropriation, Department of Justice attorneys and employees of the Social Security Administration are prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances, including “emergencies involving the safety of human life or the 4 5 protection of property.” 31 U.S.C. § 1342. 3. 6 7 Undersigned counsel therefore requests a stay of proceedings until Congress has restored appropriations to both the Department of Justice and the Social Security Administration. 8 4. If this motion for a stay is granted, the Government requests that, when Congress 9 has appropriated funds for the Department of Justice and the Social Security Administration, all 10 11 12 current deadlines for the parties be extended commensurate with the duration of the lapse in appropriations. 13 14 5. Opposing counsel has authorized the undersigned counsel to state that there is no objection to this motion. 15 Therefore, although we greatly regret any disruption caused to the Court and the other 16 17 18 19 litigants, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security hereby moves for a stay of proceedings in this case until Department of Justice and Social Security Administration attorneys are permitted to resume their usual civil litigation functions. Respectfully submitted, 20 21 22 Date: October 1, 2013 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration 23 24 25 By: 26 27 28 /s/ Cynthia B. De Nardi CYNTHIA B. DE NARDI Special Assistant United States Attorney // 2 Order re Motion for a Stay of Proceedings, 2:12-cv-2150-KJN 1 ORDER 2 3 APPROVED AND SO ORDERED. The stay of the action shall be automatically lifted when the 4 lapse in appropriations has ended, without further order of the court. The Commissioner’s cross- 5 motion for summary judgment will be due within seven (7) days thereafter. In light of the 6 extenuating circumstances, the court will entertain a stipulation for an additional extension of 7 time, if necessary. 8 Dated: October 2, 2013 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Order re Motion for a Stay of Proceedings, 2:12-cv-2150-KJN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?