Leonard v. Hartley

Filing 49

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/08/14 granting Motions for Extension of time 42 , 46 , 47 . Specifically respondent's motion is granted nunc pro tunc, to 10/17/13 the date respondent filed his answer which is considered timely. Petitioner is granted an extension of time to file a traverse and may do so within 30 days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

DAVID G. LEONARD,

12

Petitioner,

13
14

No. 2:12-CV-2161-MCE-CMK-P

vs.

ORDER

JAMES HARTLEY,

15

Respondent.

16

/

17

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of

18

habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the court are: (1) respondent’s

19

motion for an extension of time (Doc. 42) to file an answer to the petition; and (2) petitioner’s

20

duplicate motions for an extension of time (Docs. 46 and 47) to file a traverse. Good cause

21

appearing therefor, all motions are granted. Specifically, respondent’s motion is granted nunc

22

pro tunc to October 17, 2013, the date respondent filed his answer, which is considered timely.

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1

Petitioner is granted an extension of time to file a traverse and may do so within 30 days of the

2

date of this order.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5
6
7

DATED: January 8, 2014
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2