Lovett v. Skyway Machine Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 5/28/2015 ORDERING that due to a conflict with the Court's calendar, the Court hereby VACATES the trial date and the Final Pretrial Conference Hearing set for 6/4/2015. Thus, this matter must b e reset for trial. However, the Court's docket cannot accommodate a trial until summer 2016. Therefore, the Court hereby orders the parties to meet and confer as to whether both parties are willing to attend a settlement conference before the magistrate judge and whether the parties are amenable to consenting to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in order to have their trial concluded in a more timely matter. The parties are hereby ordered to file a joint statement with this Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order notifying the Court as to whether a settlement conference would be beneficial and whether they would like to consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

RAZI WAIN LOVETT,

12

No. 2:12-cv-02163-TLN-CMK

Plaintiff,

13

v.

ORDER

14

SKYWAY MACHINE INC.,

15

Defendant.

16
This matter is currently set for trial on August 3, 2015. However, due to a conflict with

17
18

the Court’s calendar, the Court hereby VACATES the trial date and the Final Pretrial Conference

19

Hearing set for June 4, 2015. Thus, this matter must be reset for trial. However, the Court’s

20

docket cannot accommodate a trial until summer 2016.
Therefore, the Court hereby orders the parties to meet and confer as to whether both

21
22

parties are willing to attend a settlement conference before the magistrate judge and whether the

23

parties are amenable to consenting to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in order to have their

24

trial concluded in a more timely matter. The parties are hereby ordered to file a joint statement

25

with this Court within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order notifying the Court as to whether

26

///

27

///

28

///
1

1

a settlement conference would be beneficial and whether they would like to consent to the

2

jurisdiction of the magistrate judge.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

Dated: May 28, 2015

5
6
7

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2