Coleman v. Hill, et. al.
Filing
30
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 4/30/15 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 2/24/15 26 are ADOPTED in full; The MOTION to DISMISS 23 is GRANTED; This action is DISMISSED without prejudice as to Defendants Fransham and Hill pursuant to FRCP 41(b); and This action be remanded to the assigned magistrate judge for scheduling. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAAHDI COLEMAN,
12
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-2171 TLN KJN P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
RICK HILL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
19
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On February 24, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
26
ORDERED that:
27
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 24, 2015 are adopted in full;
28
2. The Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 23) is granted;
1
1
2
3
3. This action is dismissed without prejudice as to Defendants Fransham and Hill
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b); and
4. This action be remanded to the assigned magistrate judge for scheduling.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: April 30, 2015
8
9
10
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?