Crossley v. Niazi et al

Filing 77

NOTICE of this court's expedited trial setting procedures upon consent of all parties signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/15/2015. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

LAMONT CROSSLEY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:12-cv-2180 TLN CKD P

v.
ABE NIAZI, et al.,

15

NOTICE OF THIS COURT’S EXPEDITED
TRIAL SETTING PROCEDURES UPON
CONSENT OF ALL PARTIES

Defendants.

16
Due to the extraordinarily high case load of the district court judges in this district, trials

17
18

in civil rights actions concerning prison conditions are often conducted by United States

19

Magistrate Judges with the consent of all the parties. A trial conducted by a magistrate judge is

20

far more likely to proceed on a scheduled trial date. Presently, when a civil trial is set before a

21

district judge, any criminal trial which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the

22

civil trial date was set first. Thus, a civil trial set before a district judge is often trailed day to day

23

or week to week until the completion of the matter occupying the district court. Consenting to the

24

jurisdiction of a magistrate judge for all purposes will generally expedite the resolution of an

25

action.

26

The parties are therefore reminded of the availability of a United States Magistrate Judge

27

to conduct all proceedings in this action. A United States Magistrate Judge is available to

28

conduct trials, including entry of final judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), Federal Rule of
1

1

Civil Procedure 73, and Local Rule 305. Any appeal from a judgment entered by a United States

2

Magistrate Judge is taken directly to the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit.

3

If all parties in this action consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge,

4

this Court will immediately schedule a trial setting hearing. The Court will proceed as follows at

5

the trial setting hearing:

6

1.

Set the matter for trial on a date certain before this Court1; and

7

2.

By agreement of the parties, vacate any previously set deadlines, such as

8

dispositive motion deadlines, if the parties stipulate that such deadlines are unnecessary and the

9

parties desire to proceed to trial expeditiously after the closing of the discovery deadlines.

10

Consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of the Eastern

11

District, if the matter proceeds to trial under this process, the Court will handle the trial just as

12

any other civil case which comes before the Court.

13

Withholding consent or declining jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge for all

14

purposes will have no effect on the merits of a party’s case or have any adverse substantive

15

consequences.2 A party may also consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction at any time, even if the

16

party has previously declined such jurisdiction.

17

Dated: December 15, 2015

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

18
19
20
21
22
23

2/cros2180.exped

24
1

25
26
27
28

See Court’s Discovery and Scheduling Order. If claims remain after a decision on the
dispositive motion, a schedule will be set for motions in limine, pre-trial statements, motions for
incarcerated witnesses, and motions for payment of unincarerated witness fees, all prior to the
first day of trial.
2

Even if the parties decline consent, under Local Rule 302 the assigned magistrate judge will still
conduct a number of pretrial matters.
2