Crossley v. Niazi et al

Filing 88

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/16/2016 GRANTING plaintiff's 87 application. The Court's 2/25/2016 order, setting plaintiff and defendants' pretrial statement deadlines is VACATED. The Court will reset the parties' pretrial statement deadlines upon ruling on plaintiff's pending motion 85 . (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6

JAMES E. HOUPT (STATE BAR NO. 187878)
[e-mail]
STEPHANIE ALBRECHT (STATE BAR NO. 281474 )
[e-mail]
RACHEL J. MUOIO (STATE BAR NO. 278371)
[e-mail]
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
400 Capitol Mall
Suite 3000
Sacramento, California 95814-4497
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7
8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Lamont Crossley

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

12
13

LAMONT CROSSLEY,

14
15
16
17

Plaintiff,
v.
ABE NIAZI, et al.,
Defendants.

No. 2:12-cv-02180 TLN CKD P
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S EXPARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER
VACATING PRETRIAL STATEMENT
DEADLINES PENDING RULING ON
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO MODIFY
THE COURT’S FURTHER
SCHEDULING ORDER

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

This matter having come before the Court on Plaintiff’s Ex Parte Application for Order
Vacating Order Setting Pretrial Statement Deadlines Pending Ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion to
Modify the Court’s Further Scheduling Order (“Application”), and good cause appearing,
Plaintiff’s Application (ECF No. 87) is GRANTED.
The Court’s February 25, 2016, Order, ECF No. 83, setting Plaintiff and Defendants’
pretrial statement deadlines is VACATED. The Court will reset the parties’ pretrial statement
deadlines upon ruling on Plaintiff’s pending Motion (ECF No. 85).

26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28

Dated: May 16, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE