Crossley v. Niazi et al

Filing 94

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/11/2016 ORDERING plaintiff's attorney's request for authority to incur costs by appointed pro bono counsel Stephanie Albrecht is GRANTED. (Crouch, J)

Download PDF
,. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ILAMONT CROSSLEY PJaintiff(s) No·12:12-C:V-2180TlN CKD P vs. IABE NIAZL etal. Defendants. ________________1 REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND REQUEST FOR PAYMENT REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE·APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incumng the cost for which reimbursement is requested. I, IStePhanle Albrecht • attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows: I was appointed to represent piainti msl in this action on loecember 29,2015 . , by the • United States District ludgelMagistrate Honorable Icarolyn K. Delaney I believe that the following course of action is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this action: Depositions of: Abe Nlazl, defendant herein; Dr. Richard P. Galloway, defendant herein; Justin Wnuk. percipient witness; Karen Todd, percipient witness; and Dr. Craig Lovett" perCipient witness and treating physician. PrQ Bono Counsel for Plaintiff Lamont Crossley will submit the costs associated with these depositions to the ranscrlpt Reimbursement Fund (TRF). Counsel seeks pre-approval from the Court, but will only seek reimbursement from the Court for any anticipated/potential amollnt above what the TRF may reimburse, If any. The estimated costs below Include a pro bono discount from the court reportIng service. (e.g., deposition of_ _ _ _ _ _• defendant herein). I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed the amount of $12.306.25 . I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated above for the completion of this contemplated course of action. ... REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES - PAGE 2 Case Number: 12:12-CV-2180nN CKD P The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter: Amount Approved Amount Paid Purpose NJA IN/A II 'I 'I I I I L I I I I I I ,I , I I I declare under penalty ofpeijury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this 11 O'iiC day of fI4i'L~ J-- , 20 I~~~ Attorney for Plaintiff(s) nle above expenditure is V / Approved rn; ,at L&>b}f.?:jkO ,California ---­Denied Or, Good cause set for discovery ----_--', on _appearing therefore. this matter is_ _---" conference, pursuant to rule _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _--', at _ in Courtroom .M. Number Dated: ~gj I ( / I f; ~7+---'----f.7~- I

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?