Jones et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/13/14 re: 36 MODIFYING 35 Scheduling Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the 35 Pretrial Scheduling Order be modified as follows: Discovery due by 10/10/2014; Settlement Confer ence set for 11/20/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Each party is DIRECTED to submit to the chambers of Judge Allison Claire confidential settlement conference statements not later than 7 days prior to the date of the Settlement Conference. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 11/3/2014, Dispositive Motions filed by 12/11/2014.. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
5 LANNY M. TRON (SBN 135339); lanny@tronlaw.com TERRY L. TRON (SBN 151151); terry@tronlaw.com MARK PACHOWICZ (SBN 138108); mark@pachowicz.com TRON & TRON 771 Daily Drive, Suite 230 Camarillo, CA 93010 Tel: (805) 388-1241 Fax: (805) 388-2091 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061 Supervising Deputy Attorney General KEVIN W. REAGER, State Bar No. 178478 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 324-5331 Fax: (916) 322-8288 E-mail: Kevin.Reager@doj.ca.gov 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendants 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, 18 SACRAMENTO DIVISION 19 20 21 JANELLE JONES, et al 22 23 CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02181-TLN-CKD JOINT STIPULATION TO FURTHER MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER Plaintiffs, vs. Action Filed: August 21, 2012 24 25 26 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, et al., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 27 28 Defendants. -1A JOINT STIPULATION TO FURTHER MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02181- TLN-CKD 1 TO THE HONORABLE TROY L. NUNLEY, U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS on August 21, 2012, Plaintiffs Janelle Jones and T.J., a minor, (“PLAINTIFFS”) filed a complaint alleging violations of 42 U.S.C. §§1983 and 1988, as well as the general laws of the United States and of the State of California against defendants California Department Of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Matthew Cates, Mike McDonald, Ed Simmerson, John McClellan, and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive (“DEFENDANTS”) [Dkt. Nos. 1-3]; 7 8 WHEREAS on February 7, 2013, PLAINTIFFS and DEFENDANTS filed a Joint Status Report. [Dkt. No. 20]; 9 10 WHEREAS on March 22, 2013, PLAINTIFFS filed a First Amended Complaint. [Dkt. No. 24]; 11 12 WHEREAS on April 23, 2013, DEFENDANTS filed an answer to the First Amended Complaint. [Dkt. No. 27]; 13 14 WHEREAS on May 2, 2013, PLAINTIFFS and DEFENDANTS filed an Updated Joint Status Report pursuant to this Court’s order. [Dkt. No. 29]; 15 16 17 18 WHEREAS on July 15, 2013, the Court issued its Pre-trial Scheduling Order. [Dkt. No. 31]; WHEREAS PLAINTIFFS and DEFENDANTS have exchanged Initial Disclosures and are presently engaging in extensive written discovery as well as the scheduling of depositions; 19 WHEREAS PLAINTIFFS’ counsel had personal and medical issues arise after the 20 Court’s issuance of its Pre-trial Scheduling Order. Plaintiff’s counsel, Lanny Tron, had major 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 surgery on July 12, 2013, which involved a five-day hospital stay. Thereafter, on August 8, 2013, Mr. Tron had to make an emergency four-day trip to Alberta, Canada, to visit his father, who had been diagnosed with terminal cancer; WHEREAS, PLAINTIFFS’ counsel is a small law firm, and Mr. Tron is primarily responsible for the handling of this case; WHEREAS, given the personal and medical issues of PLAINTIFFS’ counsel, it was not possible for counsel to adequately proceed to prosecute the case according to the Court’s July 28 -2A JOINT STIPULATION TO FURTHER MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02181- TLN-CKD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 2013 Pre-trial schedule, in October 2013, the parties filed a Stipulation to modify the Pre-trial Scheduling Order; WHEREAS, the Stipulation was approved and an Amended Scheduling Order was entered on October 18, 2013 [Dkt. No. 35]; WHEREAS, PLAINTIFFS’ counsel, Mr. Tron, thereafter underwent two further surgeries, on October 22, 2013 and on December 17, 2013, relating to his serious medical condition. The general nature of counsel’s medical condition has been disclosed to defense counsel, and these surgeries were not elective; WHEREAS plaintiff’s counsel’s recovery took longer than expected, the parties have not been able to begin the deposition process, although a first round of written discovery has been completed by both parties; WHEREAS, the parties are not seeking a further continuance of the Trial date or Pre-trial conference date at this time, but through this Stipulation do seek a continuance of certain discovery and motion cut-off dates; WHEREAS, the Parties therefore agree to a further modification of the Pre-trial Scheduling Order by rescheduling certain dates therein to the following dates or to other dates as may be amenable to the Court’s calendar: 1. 19 20 October 10, 2014 (continued from current date of April 10, 2014); 2. 21 22 3. All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the Court, and serve upon all other parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they 24 propose to tender at trial not later than November 3, 2014 (continued from 25 27 A Settlement Conference set before Judge Allison Claire on November 22, 2014; (continued from current date of May 22, 2014); 23 26 All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by the current date of June 18, 2014); and 4. The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be December 11, 2014 (continued from the current date of October 17, 2014). 28 -3A JOINT STIPULATION TO FURTHER MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02181- TLN-CKD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WHEREAS, the parties agree that the requested modifications to the Pre-trial Scheduling Order is for good cause and the modifications are in the interests of justice; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED: All parties hereto, by and through their respective attorneys of record, have agreed to the modifications to the Pre-trial Scheduling Order as set forth above, or as otherwise amenable to the Court’s calendar. Dated: March 7, 2014 TRON & TRON 8 9 By 10 11 12 Dated: March 7, 2014 /s/ LANNY M. TRON, ESQ. Attorneys for Plaintiffs CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE 13 14 By 15 ____/s/_________________ KEVIN W. REAGER, ESQ. Attorneys for Defendants 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER The Court having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and good cause appearing therefore: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Pre-trial Scheduling Order be modified as follows: 1. 22 23 All discovery, with the exception of expert discovery, shall be completed by October 10, 2014. 2. A Settlement Conference is set before Judge Allison Claire on November 20, 24 2014, at 9:00 a.m. Each party is directed to submit to the chambers of Judge 25 Allison Claire confidential settlement conference statements not later than 26 seven (7) days prior to the date of the Settlement Conference. 27 28 -4A JOINT STIPULATION TO FURTHER MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02181- TLN-CKD 1 3. 2 other parties the name, address, and area of expertise of each expert that they 3 4 All counsel are to designate in writing, file with the Court, and serve upon all propose to tender at trial not later than November 3, 2014. 4. The last day to hear dispositive motions shall be December 11, 2014. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED: 7 8 Dated: March 13, 2014 9 10 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -5- A JOINT STIPULATION TO FURTHER MODIFICATION OF SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER CASE NO. 2:12-CV-02181- TLN-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?