Roettger v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Filing 9

MDL TRANSFER ORDER, CASE TRANSFERRED to Northern District of Texas re: MDL No. 2244.(Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 11/14/12 Page Page 1 PageID 2886 Case MDL No. Document 225 879 Filed 11/14/12 1 of 3 of 3 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION FILED Nov 14, 2012 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 (SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE) CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −103) On May 23, 2011, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1407. See 787 F.Supp.2d 1358 (J.P.M.L. 2011). Since that time, 737 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Texas. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Texas and assigned to Judge Kinkeade. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. §1407 to the Northern District of Texas for the reasons stated in the order of May 23, 2011, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable James Edgar Kinkeade. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. FOR THE PANEL: Nov 14, 2012 Jeffery N. Lüthi Clerk of the Panel By s/*PAIGE LESSOR DEPUTY CLERK U.S. DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS November 14, 2012 Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 11/14/12 Page Page 2 PageID 2887 Case MDL No. Document 225 879 Filed 11/14/12 2 of 3 of 3 IN RE: DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC., PINNACLE HIP IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2244 SCHEDULE CTO−103 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC CAC 2 2 12−08291 12−08977 CAC 2 12−08978 CAC 2 12−08979 CAC 2 12−08980 Mary Johnson et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Kenneth B. Kramer v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Christopher Langdon et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al Jose Hilerio v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Terri Schnoering et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAE CAE CAE 2 2 2 12−02191 12−02192 12−02195 Glynn v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Smith v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al Roettger v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 12−05382 Stahl v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al LOUISIANA WESTERN LAW 2 12−02725 Nelson et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics Inc FARREN v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al GRIMM v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al MEYERS v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al LATIMER et al v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al PRIVETTE v. DEPUY ORTHOPAEDICS, INC. et al NEW JERSEY NJ NJ NJ 2 2 2 12−06542 12−06544 12−06546 NJ 2 12−06765 NJ 2 12−06766 NEW YORK WESTERN NYW 1 12−00990 Bauer v. DePuy Orthopaedic, Inc. et al Case 3:11-md-02244-K 2244 DocumentFiled 11/14/12 Page Page 3 PageID 2888 Case MDL No. Document 225 879 Filed 11/14/12 3 of 3 of 3 VIRGINIA EASTERN VAE 2 12−00354 Kudsk v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?