Kozacenko v. State of California

Filing 55

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/26/14 54 . (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 STEWART KATZ, State Bar No. 127425 THE LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 555 University Avenue, Suite 270 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (916) 444-5678 Fax: (916) 444-3364 E-mail: stewartkatzlaw@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Olegs Kozacenko 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ALBERTO L. GONZÁLEZ, State Bar No. 117605 Supervising Deputy Attorney General NELI N. PALMA, State Bar No. 203374 Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 445-2482 Fax: (916) 322-8288 E-mail: Neli.Palma@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol Officer Andrew Murrill and California Highway Patrol Officer J. Sherman California Highway Patrol Sergeant Kevin Pierce; California Highway Patrol Lieutenant John Arrabit; California Patrol Assistant Chief Kenneth Hill; and California Highway Patrol Commander Chief Stephen Lerwill 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 OLEGS KOZACENKO, 19 20 No. 2:12-cv-2196 MCE DAD Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 California Highway Patrol Officer ANDREW P. MURRILL (Badge #19671); California Highway Patrol Officer J. SHERMAN (Badge #11614); California Highway Patrol Sergeant KEVIN PIERCE; California Highway Patrol Lieutenant JOHN ARRABIT; California Patrol Assistant Chief KENNETH HILL; and California HIghway Patrol Commander Chief STEPHEN LERWILL,, Defendants. 28 1 1 2 3 Upon joint motion of the parties, this Court, having been duly advised, hereby ORDERS that: 1. In accordance with the terms of this Order pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a (b)(11), the 4 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), in response to a subpoena duly issued pursuant to a the 5 provisions of Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and to the regulations set forth at 28 6 C.F.R. § 16.21, et seq., may disclose to the parties records which, in whole or in part, are 7 otherwise subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, and which contain information 8 within the proper scope of discovery under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. 9 2. The FBI shall have the right to designate as subject to this Protective Order any 10 document or other item responsive to the subpoena and which is a record subject to the Privacy 11 Act or which contains or refers or relates to records which are subject to the Privacy Act. 12 3. Such documents or other tangible items must be designated as subject to this 13 Protective Order by conspicuously stamping the phrase "SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE 14 ORDER" on each page or, in the case of other tangible items, by notifying the Plaintiff in writing. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4. Information designated as SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER shall not be disclosed or disseminated to anyone, except: (a) A party, counsel for any party and the employees of such counsel to whom it is necessary that the information be disclosed for purposes of preparation for and litigation of this action; (b) Any expert engaged by a party for the purpose of assisting in the preparation of this litigation; (c) Any person who was involved in the preparation of the document or information; (d) The Court, the jury and court personnel, court reporters and persons engaged to make copies, provided that all SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER information filed with the Clerk of Court shall be filed under seal and shall be released only upon agreement among all parties, or pursuant to the terms of this Order, or by order of the Court; (e) Any other person, entity, or firm with the prior written consent of the parties. 5. Each person to whom SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER information will be 27 disseminated (other than the parties, attorneys for the parties, and the attorneys' employees, the 28 Court, the jury, court personnel, and court reporters) will be required, prior to any such 2 1 dissemination, to receive and read a copy of this PROTECTIVE ORDER and to agree, in writing, 2 to be bound by the terms of this Order and personally subject to the jurisdiction of this Court for 3 the purposes of enforcement hereof in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Counsel for any 4 party receiving SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER information and disseminating same 5 shall maintain a list of all such persons along with the written agreement of each person, and shall 6 provide copies of such written agreements upon request to other parties at any time. 7 6. When any SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER information, documents, discovery 8 responses, portions of transcripts or any other pleadings or papers disclosing or referring to such 9 SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER information are used in connection with any motion or 10 pretrial hearing, or are otherwise submitted to the Court, they shall be filed under seal and marked 11 as follows: 12 14 CONFIDENTIAL/SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER: This envelope contains documents that are subject to a protective order of this Court. The contents are not to be revealed to anyone except the Court, or with the prior written consent of the parties herein, or pursuant to any order of this Court. If the contents are thus revealed, they shall thereafter be resealed. 15 7. Within thirty (30) days of the close of this litigation for any reason, each party shall 13 16 retrieve all copies of materials marked SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER from his or its 17 own files, and from experts or other persons to whom he or it has provided such materials 18 consistent with this Order, and shall do one of the following: (1) return to the FBI all such 19 materials, including all copies thereof, or (2) certify in writing to the FBI that all such materials 20 produced by such other party during this action have been destroyed. All information protected 21 by this Order which has been placed in any electronic data bank shall be completely erased, and 22 any documents listing or summarizing information protected by this Order shall be destroyed 23 within the same period. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 3 1 8. Entry of this Order shall not, in and of itself, prejudice any contention of any party upon 2 any motion, nor shall this Order and any consent hereto constitute a waiver of any right to seek 3 relief from the Court from any and all of the provisions hereof or other modifications of the terms 4 hereof. This Order shall not limit any party's right to seek judicial review or to seek further and 5 additional protection against or limitation upon production or dissemination of information and 6 documents or their contents. 7 8 9 9. Nothing herein shall be construed to preclude or limit the presence of any individual at any hearing in or the trial or this action. 10. This order constitutes a limited authorization to the FBI and its agents and employees 10 to disclose Privacy Act protected records pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a (b)(11). In making the 11 limited disclosure set forth herein, the FBI and its agents and employees are hereby relieved of 12 any penalties to which they may otherwise be subjected pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 552a (g). 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 1 2 EXHIBIT A TO PROTECTIVE ORDER I hereby certify that I have read the PROTECTIVE ORDER entered in the above captioned 3 litigation. I hereby agree to be bound by the terms of the PROTECTIVE ORDER and to submit 4 personally to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for 5 purposes of enforcing my agreement to be bound by the terms of the PROTECTIVE ORDER. 6 Dated: 6/13/2014 THE LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ 7 /s/ Stewart Katz 8 STEWART KATZ Attorneys for Plaintiff Olegs Kozacenko 9 10 12 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California PETER A. MESHOT Supervising Deputy Attorney General 13 /s/ Alberto L. González 14 ALBERTO L. GONZÁLEZ Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol Officer Andrew Murrill and California Highway Patrol Officer J. Sherman California Highway Patrol Sergeant Kevin Pierce; California Highway Patrol Lieutenant John Arrabit; California Patrol Assistant Chief Kenneth Hill; and California Highway Patrol Commander Chief Stephen Lerwill 11 Dated: 6/24/2014 15 16 17 18 19 20 SA2012307600 31965165.doc 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5 1 2 3 ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.1 Dated: June 26, 2014 4 5 6 7 Ddad1\orders.civil kozacenko2196.stip.prot.ord4.doc 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Normally the undersigned would not authorize the entering of a stipulated protective order that granted blanket authority for the sealing of any documents. Here, however, because the discovery at issue is finite and the terms of the protective order were provided to the parties by the FBI, so that the FBI may release to the parties documents otherwise protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. ' 552a, the undersigned will allow such an order in this instance. See generally Laxalt v. McClatchy, 809 F.2d 885, 889, 258(C.A. D.C. 1987) (“Where the records sought are subject to the Privacy Act, the District Court’s supervisory responsibilities may in many cases be weightier than in the usual discovery context.”). 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?