Kozacenko v. State of California

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/13/2015 ORDERING Defendants' 64 motion to compel is GRANTED as stated on the record; and Plaintiff' 65 motion to compel is GRANTED as stated on the record. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

OLEGS KOZACENKO,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:12-cv-2196 MCE DAD

v.

ORDER

CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
OFFICER ANDREW P. MURRILL, et al.,

16

Defendants.

17
18

This matter came before the court on March 6, 2015, for hearing of defendants’ motion to

19

compel physical and mental examination and plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to deposition

20

questions. Attorneys David Wiechert and Jessica Munk appeared telephonically on behalf of the

21

plaintiff and attorneys Alberto Gonzalez and Neli Palma appeared on behalf of the defendants.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

22
23

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

24

1. Defendants’ motion to compel (Dkt. No. 64) is granted as stated on the record; and

25

2. Plaintiff’s motion to compel (Dkt. No. 65) is granted as stated on the record.

26

Dated: March 13, 2015

27
28

DAD:6

1

1

Ddad1\orders.civil\kozacenko2196.oah.030615.docx

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2