Kozacenko v. State of California

Filing 95

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/22/15 ORDERING that the entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all Defendants, is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The jury trial set for 02/08/16 is VACATED. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672 Attorney General of California ALBERTO L. GONZÁLEZ, State Bar No. 117605 Supervising Deputy Attorney General 1300 I Street, Suite 125 P.O. Box 944255 Sacramento, CA 94244-2550 Telephone: (916) 324-5369 Fax: (916) 322-8288 E-mail: Alberto.Gonzalez@doj.ca.gov Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol Officer Andrew P. Murrill and California Highway Patrol Officer J. Sherman California Highway Patrol Sergeant Kevin Pierce; California Highway Patrol Lieutenant John Arrabit; California Patrol Assistant Chief Kenneth Hill; and California Highway Patrol Commander Chief Stephen Lerwill 8 9 10 11 DONALD W. COOK, State Bar #116666 Attorney at Law 3435 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 2910 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Telephone: (213)251-9444 Fax: (213) 252-0091 Attorney for Plaintiff 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 OLEGS KOZACENKO, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. 2:12-cv-2196 MCE DAD Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND VACATING FEBRUARY 8, 2016, JURY TRIAL California Highway Patrol Officer ANDREW P. MURRILL (Badge #19671); California Highway Patrol Officer J. SHERMAN (Badge #11614); California Highway Patrol Sergeant KEVIN PIERCE; California Highway Patrol Lieutenant JOHN ARRABIT; California Patrol Assistant Chief KENNETH HILL; and California Highway Patrol Commander Chief STEPHEN LERWILL, Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr. Defendants. 25 26 THE PARTIES TO THIS ACTION, by and through their respective attorneys of record, 27 and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), hereby stipulate, in consideration 28 of a negotiated settlement in which no liability is admitted, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this 1 Stipulation and Order for Dismissal (2:12-CV-2196 MCE DAD) 1 action, including all claims stated herein against all Defendants, with each party to bear their own 2 attorney’s fees and costs. The parties request the Court vacate the jury trial set for February 8, 3 2016. 4 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between Plaintiff and 5 Defendants that this action is dismissed with prejudice and that the material allegations of the 6 Second Amended Complaint are withdrawn in full by Plaintiff. 7 8 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: October 20, 2015 9 /s/ Alberto L. González ALBERTO L. GONZÁLEZ Supervising Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants California Highway Patrol Officer Andrew P. Murrill; California Highway Patrol Officer J. Sherman; California Highway Patrol Sergeant Kevin Pierce; California Highway Patrol Lieutenant John Arrabit; California Patrol Assistant Chief Kenneth Hill; and California Highway Patrol Commander Chief Stephen Lerwill 10 11 12 13 14 15 KAMALA D. HARRIS Attorney General of California Dated: October 20, 2015 16 DONALD W. COOK, Attorney at Law By: /s/ Donald W. Cook DONALD W. COOK Attorney for Plaintiff 17 18 ORDER 19 20 21 22 23 24 The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all Defendants, is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The jury trial set for February 8, 2016, is hereby vacated. The matter having been concluded in its entirety, the Clerk of Court is directed to close the file. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 22, 2015 25 26 __________ __________ ___________ __________ ____ MORRISON C. ENGL N LAND, JR, C CHIEF JUDG GE UNITED ST TATES DIS STRICT COU URT 27 28 2 Stipulation and Order for Dismissal (2:12-CV-2196 MCE DAD)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?