Dye v. Barnes

Filing 69

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 09/19/14 ordering as to 63 MOTION to DISMISS ( Motion Hearing continued to 10/29/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan.) (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

BARRY MORRIS, SBN #48368
Attorney at Law
1220 Oakland Blvd. #200
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
[phone]
fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

Attorney for Petitioner
WILLIAM R. DYE

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM R. DYE,
Petitioner,
v.
FRED FOULK, Warden,
Respondent./

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

No. 2:12-cv-02201 TLN-EFB

Stipulation and Order
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between BARRY MORRIS, attorney for
petitioner, WILLIAN R. DYE, and MAX FEINSTAT, attorney for respondent FRED
FOULK, that the hearing on respondent’s Motion to Dismiss be continued from
October 8, 2014 to October 29, 2014. This stipulation is based upon the
attached declaration of BARRY MORRIS.
Dated: September 15, 2014
/s/ Barry Morris
Attorney for Petitioner
WILLIAM R. DYE

26
27
28

/s/Max Feinstat
Attorney for Respondent
FRED FOULK
1

1
2
3
4

Declaration of Barry Morris
I, BARRY MORRIS, do hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the
following is true and correct:
1.

I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all the courts of the State

5

of California, the United States District Court for the Northern, Central, and

6

Eastern Districts of California, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

7

Circuit, and the United States Supreme Court. I represent the petitioner in the

8

above-entitled action;

9

2.

I am in the process of preparing a response to Respondent’s Motion

10

to Dismiss. Initially I concentrated on the relation-back issue, but as I turned

11

my attention to newly-discovered evidence issue (§2244(d)(1)(D) “the date on

12

which the factual predicate of the claim or claims presented could have been

13

discovered through the exercise of due diligence”), I realized that I did not have

14

all the necessary documents including those referred to by petitioner in his pro

15

se first amended petition.

16

3.

I wrote to petitioner at the beginning of this month for those

17

documents, but as of this past Friday, I had not received them.

18

planning on going to Tahoe that weekend, I drove up to Susanville to see

19

petitioner. It turned out that he was in administrative segregation and did not

20

have his legal papers. I went through what I need and he told me that he will

21

request those documents and send them to me within the next week.

22

4.

Since I was

I am leaving this Friday for a week and will not be able to begin

23

working with those documents to finish the opposition to the motion to dismiss

24

until I get back on September 27th.

25
26

5.

Consequently I am asking that the hearing on respondent’s motion

go over until October 29, 2014. Respondent has no objection to this request.

27
28
2

1
2

Dated: September 16, 2014
/s/Barry Morris
BARRY MORRIS
Attorney for Petitioner
WILLIAM R. DYE

3
4
5

Order

6
7

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, it is hereby ordered that the

8

hearing on Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss in the above-entitled case be

9

continued from October 8, 2014 to October 29, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

10

Dated: September 19, 2014.

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3