Dalitz et al v. AmSurg Corp. et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/6/2015 ORDERING the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference and submit a joint status report by 1/20/2015; ORDERING the defendants to respond to the Complaint by 1/20/2015. (Michel, G)

6

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD, SBN 65070
GARY B. CALLAHAN, SBN 47543
TIFFANY B. WONG, SBN 280620
CLAYEO C. ARNOLD
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
865 Howe Avenue
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail],
[e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Relators

1
2
3
4
5

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and the
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ex rel. DOUGLAS
DALITZ and RANDY GRAY,

14

Relators,
vs.

15
16
17
18
19

AMSURG CORP.; GASTROENTEROLOGY
ASSOCIATES ENDOSCOPY CENTER,
L.L.C.; REDDING GASTROENTEROLOGY,
L.L.C. d/b/a REDDING ENDOSCOPY
CENTER; GADDAM NARESH REDDY,
M.D.; PIYUSH KUMAR DHANUKA, M.D.;
AND B. NICHOLAS NAMIHAS, M.D.,
Defendants.

20
21

24

Case No.: 12-cv-2218 TLN CKD
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND DATE OF RULE 26(f)
CONFERENCE, JOINT STATUS
REPORT, AND DEFENDANTS’
RESPONSE TO THE COMPLAINT

Courtroom: 2
Judge:
Hon. Troy L. Nunley

Upon Stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, it is so ORDERED that:

22
23

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1) This Court’s prior Order Requiring Joint Status Report is hereby modified to allow the
Parties until January 20, 2015, to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference and submit a joint status report;
and

25

2) The Defendants shall have until January 20, 2015, to respond to the Complaint.

26
27
28

///
-1-

Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Date of Rule 26(f) Conference, Joint Status Report, and Defendants’
Response to the Complaint

1

IT IS SO ORDERED:

2
Dated: January 6, 2015
3
4
5
6
7

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-

Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Date of Rule 26(f) Conference, Joint Status Report, and Defendants’
Response to the Complaint