Ballard v. Wong et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/30/2018 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 44 are ADOPTED in FULL; and Plaintiff's 41 Motion for relief under Rule 60(a) is GRANTED to reflect that plaintiff was convicted under 18:2423(b). (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN MARVIN BALLARD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:12-cv-2226-JAM-CMK v. ORDER SAMUEL WONG, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a civil detainee proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 17 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 19 Eastern District of California local rules. On March 30, 2018, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations 20 21 herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file 22 objections within a specified time. Objections to the findings and recommendations have been 23 filed. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 25 304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the 26 entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by 27 proper analysis. 28 /// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed March 30, 2018, are adopted in full; 3 4 5 6 7 and 2. Plaintiff’s motion for relief under Rule 60(a) (Doc. 41) is granted to reflect that plaintiff was convicted under 18U.S.C. § 2423(b). DATED: May 30, 2018 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ _____ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?