Fetter v. Bonner, et al.,

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 9/17/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's Ex Parte MOTION 5 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GEORGE FETTER, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 16 PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF, EDWARD N. BONNER, individually and in his Official Capacity; COUNTY OF PLACER; CALIFORNIA FORENSICS MEDICAL GROUP (CFMG); PLACER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT; and Does 1 through 20, 17 Defendants. ________________________________ 13 14 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:12-cv-02235-GEB-EFB ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION 18 19 On September 11, 2012, Plaintiff filed an ex parte motion “to 20 declare the temporary case number practice of deleting case filings from 21 the system for failure to timely pay to be unconstitutional . . . .” 22 (ECF No. 5.) 23 Applications for relief on shortened time are governed by 24 Local Rule 144(e), which 25 supported by an affidavit of counsel. Plaintiff’s ex parte motion is not 26 supported by an affidavit. Further, Plaintiff has not adequately shown 27 circumstances “claimed to prescribes justify 28 1 that the the application issuance of an must be order [on 1 shortened] time.” E.D. Cal. R. 144(e). Therefore, Plaintiff’s ex parte 2 motion is denied. 3 Dated: September 17, 2012 4 5 6 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. Senior United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?