Buckmaster v. Sodexo, Inc. et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/3/2013 ORDERING Defendant Sharon Cross DISMISSED without prejudice. (Krueger, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

DEREK BUCKMASTER,
Plaintiff,

10
v.

11

14

SODEXO, formerly known as
SODEXHO ALLIANCE, a foreign
corporation; MILA STURGIS;
MICHELINE JOHNSON; and DOES
1-50, inclusive,

15

Defendants.*
________________________________

12
13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:12-cv-02244-GEB-JFM
ORDER OF DISMISSAL

16
17

Plaintiff was required to respond to an Order filed December

18

4, 2012, by either filing proof that Defendant Sharon Cross was served

19

with process or a document showing good cause for Plaintiff’s failure to

20

serve this Defendant within the 120-day period prescribed in Federal

21

Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (ECF No. 12.) This filing was due no later

22

than December 28, 2012.

23

that failure to make the required showing by the deadline would result

24

in Defendant Sharon Cross being dismissed from this action.

25

///

26

///

Id.

The December 4th Order warned Plaintiff

27
28

*

The caption has been amended according to the dismissal of
Defendant Sharon Cross.
1

1

Plaintiff failed to respond to the December 4th Order by this

2

deadline. Therefore, Defendant Sharon Cross is dismissed from this

3

action without prejudice.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

January 3, 2013

6
7
8

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2