Bontemps v. Barnes, et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/8/14 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendant Abbotts motion to revoke plaintiffs IFP status.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:12-cv-2249 DAD P

v.

ORDER

RON BARNES et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
On May 30, 2014, defendant Abbott filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis

17
18

(“IFP”) status. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written

19
20

opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to

21

the granting of the motion . . . .”
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days of the

22
23

date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendant Abbott’s motion to revoke

24

plaintiff’s IFP status. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

opposition to the motion and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed

2

pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

3

Dated: July 8, 2014

4
5
6

DAD:9
bont2249.46

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2