Bontemps v. Barnes, et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/8/14 ORDERING that within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendant Abbotts motion to revoke plaintiffs IFP status.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:12-cv-2249 DAD P
v.
ORDER
RON BARNES et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
On May 30, 2014, defendant Abbott filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis
17
18
(“IFP”) status. Plaintiff has not opposed the motion.
Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: “Failure of the responding party to file written
19
20
opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to
21
the granting of the motion . . . .”
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one days of the
22
23
date of this order, plaintiff shall file an opposition, if any, to defendant Abbott’s motion to revoke
24
plaintiff’s IFP status. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as a statement of non-
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
opposition to the motion and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed
2
pursuant Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
3
Dated: July 8, 2014
4
5
6
DAD:9
bont2249.46
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?