Martinez v. Director of CDCR

Filing 86

ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 6/5/2017 ORDERING the petitioner to file a Motion to Vacate Judgment pursuant to F.R.Cv.P. 60(b) by 7/5/2017; ORDERING the respondent to file an opposition to said motion by 8/4/2017; ORDERING the petitioner to file any reply by 8/18/2017. (cc: Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DEREK MARTINEZ, No. 2:12-cv-02273-JKS Petitioner, vs. ORDER [Re: Briefing Schedule upon Limited Remand] SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden, Pleasant Valley State Prison, Respondent. This Court denied Derek Martinez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, habeas relief and a certificate of appealability on May 12, 2015. Docket Nos. 70, 71. Martinez timely filed a notice of appeal, Docket No. 72, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals granted a certificate of appealability with respect to: 1) whether the prosecutor committed misconduct manipulating the witness; and 2) whether Martinez can demonstrate, in light of new evidence, that he is actually innocent of the offense, Docket No. 12 (Ninth Cir. Case No. 15-16082). On appeal, Martinez moved in September 2016 to supplement the record with DNA testing and reporting that resulted from state court litigation conducted from prior to the filing of his federal Petition through 2016. Docket No. 30 (Ninth Cir. Case No. 15-16082). The Ninth Circuit denied the request without prejudice to counsel seeking a written indication from this Court that it would be inclined to consider the new evidence in the first instance in a Rule 60(b) motion, if the Court of Appeals issued a limited remand. Docket No. 33 (Ninth Cir. Case No. 15-16082). Martinez then requested that the Ninth Circuit hold the appeal in abeyance to allow him to seek an indicative ruling in this Court and remand the matter for consideration of the Rule 60(b) motion. Docket No. 51 (Ninth Cir. Case No. 15-16082). The Ninth Circuit denied Martinez’s request for a limited remand without prejudice to filing a renewed motion in the event this Court issued an indicative ruling in his favor, and stayed the appellate proceedings pending this Court’s decision on the indicative ruling motion. Docket No. 53 (Ninth Cir. Case No. 12-16082). Martinez moved in this Court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a) for an indicative ruling, and the Court granted the request after finding that Martinez’s motion to vacate raises a substantial issue. Docket No. 85. The record on appeal indicates that the Ninth Circuit granted Martinez’s motion for a limited remand to permit this Court to consider newly-discovered evidence in support of his claim for actual innocence. Docket No. 57 (Ninth Cir. Case No. 12-16082). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Martinez shall have up to and including July 5, 2017, to file a motion to vacate this Court’s judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Procedure 60(b). Respondent shall have up to and including August 4, 2017, to file an opposition. Martinez shall have up to an including August 18, 2017, to file a reply. The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Dated: June 5, 2017. /s/James K. Singleton, Jr. JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR. Senior United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?